The Hoey appeal has been listed on 28 March 2022, for 5 days.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Hoey appeal listed
Collapse
X
-
-
I've dipped in to day 4 of the appeal (Hoey (claimant/appellant) & ors v Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (defendant/respondent) - YouTube).
Am I right to feel that HMRC are getting a bit of a grilling and are fluffing it a bit?
About 2:45 into the stream there are some references to the "End User" and what responsibility they have for using TP services which may have challenging (challengeable) tax setups - One of these "End Users" I worked for was HMRC! One of the reasons I thought I was on safe ground with MTM/ Montpelier...
Anyone else work at HMRC or other Govt Depts? Does this matter?
-
I've been enjoying the Armadillo tweets even though I don't understand 99% of what's going on -
https://twitter.com/ArmadilloSupprt/...37561683431432Comment
-
Seems like the judges want to side with HMRC on the PAYE issue who say they have a discretion apparently allowed in a manual that no-one is allowed to see that contradicts what is in the public manual. Essentially the judges want to find in favour of HMRC because they don't like tax avoidance rather than based on the actual law.Comment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostSeems like the judges want to side with HMRC on the PAYE issue who say they have a discretion apparently allowed in a manual that no-one is allowed to see that contradicts what is in the public manual. Essentially the judges want to find in favour of HMRC because they don't like tax avoidance rather than based on the actual law.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostSeems like the judges want to side with HMRC on the PAYE issue who say they have a discretion apparently allowed in a manual that no-one is allowed to see that contradicts what is in the public manual. Essentially the judges want to find in favour of HMRC because they don't like tax avoidance rather than based on the actual law.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment