Suggestions for Tax advisors that can help newcomer posters

[Iliketax]

Gordon Berry
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2837150

If it is the same person, he may well know how some of the schemes were operated: Revenue & Customs v Hyrax Resourcing Ltd & Ors (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Anti-avoidance) [2019] UKFTT 175 (TC) (05 March 2019))

[huntingground]

I thought it was common knowledge that Matt Hall and Gordon Berry were scheme operators back in the day?

That is precisely why I have never trusted them.

[ns1]

I thought it was common knowledge that Matt Hall and Gordon Berry were scheme operators back in the day?

That is precisely why I have never trusted them.

So Hoey is represented by a former scam peddler.

Lancashire's advisors doesn't have clean hands either.

[BrilloPad]

So the thread is about tax advisers that can help people and yet mostly contains posts about nothing to do with the subject.

In any sensible professional forum having mods of any sense the errant posts would have been removed and the posters permabanned.

Luckily for posters the mods have no sense. Before my permaban,. I am trying to collect infractions from all 4 mods. I doubt I will get that far.

[Darkpaw]

So Hoey is represented by a former scam peddler.

Might be better that someone who knows how a scheme works is capable of defending the scheme? Besides, Matt Hall is doing this for free.

As I'm affected by Hoey, my contributions since 2011 have been about £600 in total, and for that my APNS have been stayed, and we've gone to the FTT and the UTT. Seems quite reasonable.

[dammit chloe]

So Hoey is represented by a former scam peddler.

Lancashire's advisors doesn't have clean hands either.

Cough. Rebus. Cough.

[Invisiblehand]

So the thread is about tax advisers that can help people and yet mostly contains posts about nothing to do with the subject.

In any sensible professional forum having mods of any sense the errant posts would have been removed and the posters permabanned.

Luckily for posters the mods have no sense. Before my permaban,. I am trying to collect infractions from all 4 mods. I doubt I will get that far.

Are you here to recommend Phil Manley like you used to?

[NotAllThere]

It seems the current not-WTT/BG recommendations, among all the , are:

Cobham Murphy (John Green)
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2837264
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2837409

Gilbert Tax
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2837383

Matt Hall or Gordon Berry
https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2837150

and of course, the ever popular

Don't bother, just negotiate with HMRC yourself.

[Saleos]

If it is the same person, he may well know how some of the schemes were operated: Revenue & Customs v Hyrax Resourcing Ltd & Ors (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Anti-avoidance) [2019] UKFTT 175 (TC) (05 March 2019))

Gordon only became a Director of PPHOS 23 September 2015. He took on what others wouldn't and has to put up with libellous BS like that spouted by NS1.

[lowpaidworker]

and of course, the ever popular

Don't bother, just negotiate with HMRC yourself.

Given most tax advisors and not picking on any for negotiating a settlement, charge around 1000 plus vat to agree sums which are readily available online or one can do themselves I personally think the charge is a bit steep.

The value add is really because HMRC staff do not know what they are talking about which for me is the real issue. The problem we all have is once you agree to something if it conspires they HMRC were wrong but you sign on the dotted line then tough cookies. I really believe this is a fundamentally incorrect approach and we should never been in that situation. If the sums were wrong and HMRC actually charged too much tax this should be adjusted or corrected. From what I can make out LCAG are trying or pushing for this to be corrected for those that are settling.