Originally posted by cwah
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Things about to get very serious and much more real? / Felicitas Letters
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Nanas1 View Post
Non Recorded delivery, No proof you've even received the letter........ THEY CAN RAM ITPublic Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
I think you will find that legal precedent is that if the sender has proof of posting a letter, the law assumes that it was received.Comment
-
Originally posted by Nanas1 View Post
So how can they prove I have knowledge of their impending actions if the letter gets "Lost" in the post....... You can't admit what you don't know
But the sender can prove they sent it. So, legal precedent is that you did receive it. That's been case law in the UK for a very long time. You'll get nowhere trying that argument.
Doing so under oath is perjury.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
To HMRC it's a tax avoidance scheme, to the IoM court it's money from a trust that was lent to you and which the trust is seeking to be returned.
Where the money started off is completely irrelevant here - what is important is the steps from the point the money was in the trust and what happened to it after that.
Sadly (but very importantly as you need to understand this) how the money get to the trust is not going to be relevant to this court case.
At the end of the day, without myself paying into said fund there would have been no money for them to loan out....Comment
-
Originally posted by Nanas1 View Post
But who funded the trust in the first place?? Wee did, or I certainly did in my case with the Invoices I submitted, A substantial fee was taken each month to facilitate this. Do we go after them for the return of the fees they charged us??
At the end of the day, without myself paying into said fund there would have been no money for them to loan out....
Calming down and an honest appraisal of the facts is what's required here.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
None of which is actually relevant to the fact that you have an outstanding loan that looks like it's going to be called in. That's all that really matters. The rest of the stuff up there is just a rant.
Calming down and an honest appraisal of the facts is what's required here.Comment
-
Originally posted by Nanas1 View Post
Looking back at my contract of employment through Garraway / Wisemove, the word loan is not mentioned once
You also need to understand the point about Schrödinger Money.
just because HMRC regard the money as income on which tax is due, the trust and (none tax tribunals) courts are perfectly able to regard the money the trust paid to you as a loan that is now due repaymentLast edited by eek; 4 November 2022, 11:26.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by Nanas1 View Post
Looking back at my contract of employment through Garraway / Wisemove, the word loan is not mentioned oncePublic Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Seems a wee bit ambitious asking for 50%, especially when Felicitas have already picked the low hanging fruit.Scoots still says that Apr 2020 didn't mark the start of a new stock bull market.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment