Originally posted by DavidD
View Post
Is this seriously how bills are past, by having a bias interpretation to a group of committee members who don’t understand the truth and technicalities and just go along and say ‘eye’.
I listened to most of it, but didn’t hear anything about amending the date to 2017? Did I miss that?
I believe there is another formal process for further discussion in parliament to potentially change the bill?
This idea of spreading payments over 3 yrs is a joke; if 18/19 returns have to be revised by Sep 20 and tax paid Jan 21, wouldn’t this also apply to the tax due for 19/20 as tax due also Jan 21. Tax year 20/21 is due Jan 22, therefore the entire tax is basically over just 1 year
Comment