Originally posted by stonehenge
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
CALL TO ACTION: Loan Charge debate on Thursday the 11th
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostComment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostAll his links I expect are purely coincidental. I mean why wouldn't Amazon do business with a small family run advertising business.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI know none of the details.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostI doubt just about anyone else does either, especially the suckers who believe this nonsense.
It may work it may not but there will be a long court battle either way. Which was also clearly stated.
Seems more like a kick the can approach. Even if technically legal suspect HMRC can twist some arms to catch it.Comment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostI can't find the page now but there was a complete description of what it was about and how it worked. Seems like it was about phoenixing a loan in a way that didn't trigger Loan Charge under terms that didn't leave you liable. I know that sounds obvious but there were details of the appropriate relevant steps.
It may work it may not but there will be a long court battle either way. Which was also clearly stated.
Seems more like a kick the can approach. Even if technically legal suspect HMRC can twist some arms to catch it.
If you can afford to settle then great. If not, then you have to fight.
Hopefully the JR will succeed and this will all prove irrelevant. I suppose now the 5th April deadline is passed. You are either in it or not. So we will have to wait and see. Though I expect to be dead by the time the outcome is known.Comment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostI can't find the page now but there was a complete description of what it was about and how it worked. Seems like it was about phoenixing a loan in a way that didn't trigger Loan Charge under terms that didn't leave you liable. I know that sounds obvious but there were details of the appropriate relevant steps.
It may work it may not but there will be a long court battle either way. Which was also clearly stated.
Seems more like a kick the can approach. Even if technically legal suspect HMRC can twist some arms to catch it.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostMaybe you're right. Though from experience, I'd say the devil is in the (undisclosed) detail here. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that in the public domain, what's declared is in fact, just as likely to be completely incorrect. Why would that be? All part of the effort to side step and mislead the tax authorities who no dobut are investigating the scheme(s) while we read here. Sorry, but I think now is definitely not the time to trust or be naive in anyway about something as serious as deliberate, serious tax avoidance, maybe bordering on wilfull evasion. (Refer HMRC tax spotlights for example). Believe me, a scheme to fix a scheme is going to fail big time and users will face penalties like you've never seen before. It's high stakes this time around.Comment
-
Originally posted by dammit chloe View PostMaybe. I would say both sides of the tax divide are as bad as each other at perpetuating the average joe's misery and just as likely to be right/wrong. The only difference is that HMRC is Government backed which is a very big trump card.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment