Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
CALL TO ACTION: Loan Charge debate on Thursday the 11th
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Today’s debate resumed around 16:00 on the parliament tv, and Stride giving his response about 16:45Comment
-
Stride conforming that HMRC have a dedicated team to manage TTP and there is no definite limit to time to pay. Ok how about £50 a month for the next 50 yearsComment
-
Originally posted by Iter View PostStride conforming that HMRC have a dedicated team to manage TTP and there is no definite limit to time to pay. Ok how about £50 a month for the next 50 yearsComment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostSo Loan Charge stands?
There are several other avenues for APPG / MPs though to try and effect change if they can get a majority of MPs so lets see what happens (Statutory Instruments amendment, Amendment in 2020 Finance Bill due this summer though this may take effect too late....).Comment
-
Originally posted by wilks View Postwhat were you expecting? The debate was pointless as there is no binding outcome, Mel can simply ignore. Surprised he even bothered to show up.
There are several other avenues for APPG / MPs though to try and effect change if they can get a majority of MPs so lets see what happens (Statutory Instruments amendment, Amendment in 2020 Finance Bill due this summer though this may take effect too late....).
The thing is to challenge the finance act its in effect a vote of no confidence in the government.
It will be interesting to see what LCAG do next. Personally I think they have been way too polite so far. They remind me of the fathers right movement up until 2002 - asking politely. How long before the penny drops?
The thing about fathers rights is you have a steady stream of victims each year. So they had time - took 4 years to get the Children Act 2006. Tick tock.....Comment
-
not sure
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI have to admit I was expecting a defeat. However LCAG have exceeded all expectations . They have really challenged HMRC.
The thing is to challenge the finance act its in effect a vote of no confidence in the government.
It will be interesting to see what LCAG do next. Personally I think they have been way too polite so far. They remind me of the fathers right movement up until 2002 - asking politely. How long before the penny drops?
The thing about fathers rights is you have a steady stream of victims each year. So they had time - took 4 years to get the Children Act 2006. Tick tock.....Comment
-
Originally posted by RobScott View Postpublic opinion is against tax avoidance news ... so can't be compared with fathers right movement!
Public opioion is against tax avoidance. However it is against retrospection. It is against not closing loopholes quickly. And it is against forcing people into suicide.
I have gone public with my own mental health issues to try to help LCAG. I don't know what I would have done without Phil helping me against HMRC(for DTA).
And I intend to repay the favour by helping LCAG all I can.Comment
-
Originally posted by wilks View Postwhat were you expecting? The debate was pointless as there is no binding outcome, Mel can simply ignore. Surprised he even bothered to show up.
There are several other avenues for APPG / MPs though to try and effect change if they can get a majority of MPs so lets see what happens (Statutory Instruments amendment, Amendment in 2020 Finance Bill due this summer though this may take effect too late....).Comment
-
Originally posted by NeedTheSunshine View PostThe debate wasn't pointless. There is no binding outcome but the motion was won and is now a matter of record.
I think that "winning" a debate, with no subsequent impact is of very little interest/consolation to those facing the tax bills.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment