I'm sure that this has been covered before and there will be no simple answer, but any advice on the pros and cons of paying back the loan would be much appreciated. All the costs of (IHT, NI, tax, interest etc) look prohibitive. If I pay back, say £500k to the trust then I now have £500k in the trust and assume that there are some pros..? The cons are obviously that I need to get my hands on it somehow. Also, can the trust be unwound and pay the money back to the company? My understanding is that the settlement opportunity allows one to pay back the loan. Any thoughts very much appreciated. Never a simple answer.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Paying back the loan
Collapse
X
-
-
Erm....
Without further details from you....you appear to be asking how, you, as the beneficiary of a Trust, which has loaned you £500k can repay the loan and get your money back?
Well, the truth be told, is simply - you can't...You don't have any money in the Trust, you have repaid the loan that you took out from them. You have had the use of that money. Its a bit like drawing cash from your Bank, as an overdraft. You have had the use of that money and you owe it to the bank. Once you repay your overdraft, you don't have any "money in the bank", you are neutral.
In the case of a Trust, I am assuming that you are referring to an EBT scheme? If so, then the income that "you" earned was assigned to the Trust, and you drew your "income" (mostly) as a (non-repayable) loan.
You need to seek Legal and Taxation advice.I was an IPSE Consultative Council Member, until the BoD abolished it. I am not an IPSE Member, since they have no longer have any relevance to me, as an IT Contractor. Read my lips...I recommend QDOS for ALL your Insurance requirements (Contact me for a referral code). -
Yes, there is a simple answer. Don't do it. If it gets paid to your company you get taxed on it (PAYE, employee's NIC and employer's NIC) as you company is a "relevant person". If the trustee 'earmarks' the cash for you or your family or whoever you want then you get taxed on it (PAYE, employee's NIC and employer's NIC). If the trustee is not going to earmark it for you (however informally), why on earth are you going to repay it?Originally posted by Not Losing Any Sleep View PostNever a simple answer.
There's a few threads that mention earmarking (google "site:forums.contractoruk.com earmarking"). When you talk your tax adviser, ask them about s554B (the earmarking thing) and why s554R(1)(c) would stop s554R applying.Comment
-
Someone else came out with this a few days ago, and he didn't seem to understand it either.Originally posted by Not Losing Any Sleep View Post. If I pay back, say £500k to the trust then I now have £500k in the trust
You started out with £0
The trust lent you £500,000
That means you were loaned £500,000.
The trust is currently owed £500,000 by you.
If you pay the trust back £500,000, then the trust is no longer owed anything by you. They do not have £500,000 of your money. They have a paid off loan.
Now there's a completely separate transaction that took place between your limited company - not you - and another company (but not the trust) where your limited company - not you - paid the other company some money.
Your limited company would have to get that company to credit those invoices for your company to get the money back.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Paying Back the loan
So for my case I paid an amount to Procorre (in my case) from the ltd company and then we got paid some money into our personal account directly from Procorre, including the a Business expense. They take 16% of the amount that was paid to them by the LTD company.
So are we saying that because we have had no payment made back to LTD company nothing needs to be paid back..? A little confused tbhComment
-
No they are NOT saying this.Originally posted by I need advise View Post
So are we saying that because we have had no payment made back to LTD company nothing needs to be paid back..? A little confused tbh
https://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc...ml#post2556770
They are saying that having a Ltd company in this mix has made the outcome more serious for you as you need to consider Employer's NI as well.
They are saying that you need to speak to independent tax advisor to get help with this."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment