Originally posted by original PM
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Western Antarctic ice sheet collapse has already begun, scientists warn
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
I'm not disputing that. I'm just pointing out that spending on climate related disaster mitigation isn't what it could be.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.' -
Which means we have more to defend.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostNL isn't really a fair comparison as by rights half the country should be underwater, whereas we only have small bits (like the Somerset Levels) below sea-level. Plus we're surrounded on all sides by coast.
Also, flooding isn't exclusive to places that are below sea level where precipitation is concerned as previous years have proven.
None of those are island nations, but feel free to dig out the figures and prove your point. I think you should throw Japan in there as well.I wonder how UK spending compares to France, Spain, Italy, The US perhaps? I bet it's not that dissimilar in how seriously we take the threat.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
I'm talking about spending on flood defences. Nothing to do with CO2 or renewable energy. We need those whether CO2 is what causes climate change or not.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyYes the sky over the UK will be CO2 free shortly, unlike China and India where they are furiously pumping out CO2 like there is no tomorrow.
Even if you did believe in Global Warming, what impact is the UK actually making when every other large polluter just carries on? / Why does the UK have to impoverish itself to prove a point to countries that won't get the point?
Sea levels are rising. Whether CO2 causes it or not doesn't matter, we still have a problem to deal with.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Too lateOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNonsense, just hire in some Poles and get them to build a 100 ft high wall all the way around the British coast. It´ll keep the immigrants IN too!

Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Where is PJ Clarke when you need him?


Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Now you've done it, agent! You've opened up the gates of SkS upon this site once again via one of its witch doctors!Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhere is PJ Clarke when you need him?


If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.Comment
-
And it'd still be over sooner than PPI.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyStill 500 years of global warming research grants will keep many generations of scientists and politicians in jobs. -- Just keep billing --
Comment
-
That seems a rather poor counter-example. I don't know the details but a drought is a rather tangible thing. If you have a drought that has lasted for 5 years and people will be dying in 3 years if it doesn't stop, and it will take you 3 years to build something to mitigate that, you don't really have a choice.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostThe Australians built expensive desalination plants to mitigate the "permanent drought" in Queensland.
Guess what happened?
The permanent drought ended.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Yes, fine, except if it's simply variable weather. That's been going on for centuries.Originally posted by d000hg View PostThat seems a rather poor counter-example. I don't know the details but a drought is a rather tangible thing. If you have a drought that has lasted for 5 years and people will be dying in 3 years if it doesn't stop, and it will take you 3 years to build something to mitigate that, you don't really have a choice.If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.Comment
-
No, you can't really afford to say "it's probably going to rain in the next year or two". You still have to do something if you have a prolonged drought.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Today 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59

Comment