Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Quite. As someone who earns a crust in Health Economics, I can tell you the situation with the NHS is more dire than most people know.
And it's interesting that the same morons who spout about EU red tape, but couldn't give me any single example of how it affects me as a small business, are the first to say "Save our [socialist red-tape ridden inefficient] NHS", the institution which will lead to national bankruptcy if carried on as it is.
You can't overestimate people's stupidity.
True, but how much of the endless torrent of EU legislation relates to health & safety and thus the NHS?
True, but how much of the endless torrent of EU legislation relates to health & safety and thus the NHS?
.
What endless torrent?
In any case surely health and safety legislation is a good thing, since in the context of our discussion, it would lead to less use of the health service
From my limited use of the NHS it could do with some extra regulations with regard to cleanliness.
FFS, sometimes I wonder how you cretins manage to make a living with your poor logical skills.
We have a large population (so likelihood of a larger number of "patients"), combined with high Population Density, squeezing these people into smaller areas producing high concentrations needing medical care.
Above England, and even above the UK as a whole, the only countries with higher Pop Density have pretty small populations in total, where the number of patients is likely to be smaller. They can make do with a smaller number of hospitals in total.
Those with higher populations but lower density will find each hospital needing to deal with a relatively smaller number of patients.
We have a large population (so likelihood of a larger number of "patients"), combined with high Population Density, squeezing these people into smaller areas producing high concentrations needing medical care.
Above England, and even above the UK as a whole, the only countries with higher Pop Density have pretty small populations in total, where the number of patients is likely to be smaller. They can make do with a smaller number of hospitals in total.
Those with higher populations but lower density will find each hospital needing to deal with a relatively smaller number of patients.
Are you saying that governments haven't done a good job of planning the necessary healthcare in the places it's going to be needed?
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Comment