• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

More Farage wisdom

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    UKIP have slowly developed enough support to become main stream over a couple of decades and you are busy knocking them.
    You've proved my point; UKIP have come from almost nowhere to become mainstream, so how on earth can anyone claim that the Tories and Labour have some monopoly?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      It's extremely democratic; you ask people ' do you want bla bla bla ', then they say 'no', then you ask them 'are you sure?'

      Following your argument it's undemocratic to hold an election every 5 years. People have got the MPs they elected, so why bother asking them again and again?
      I spend a fair bit of time in Ireland, where my in-laws live.

      The EU pressure on Ireland to rerun referenda is seen as undemocratic for this reason:

      You ask people ' do you want bla bla bla ', then they say 'no', then you ask them 'are you sure?', and then when you get the answer you want you stop asking them.

      Following your argument it's democratic to hold an election every 5 years until you get the MPs elected that you want and then you don't hold any more elections.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
        So there's no harm in having a vote every 5 to 10 years on it?
        on what - the existence of the Monarchy. Why not but don't be surprised if the royal company become more political. I'm reasonably happy with the status Quo and apart from a few Guardian journalists I think I'm in the majority.

        On who is in the Government - we do and it keeps them in check.

        On the EU - we haven't had a vote on whether we want them to rule us. So yes please!

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          It's extremely democratic; you ask people ' do you want bla bla bla ', then they say 'no', then you ask them 'are you sure?'

          Following your argument it's undemocratic to hold an election every 5 years. People have got the MPs they elected, so why bother asking them again and again?
          Because the question is "Who do you want to elect to represent you for the next 5 years" not "Who do you want to elect to represent you for life".

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by vetran View Post
            FTFY

            We know the Tories have deals with business & odd sexual preferences, Labour are bigoted lefties who are waist deep in expense scandals like the others and most people who had a choice would want them all to go to prison.

            UKIP have slowly developed enough support to become main stream over a couple of decades and you are busy knocking them.
            So presumably you don't knock the Labour party because they are mainstream.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              I spend a fair bit of time in Ireland, where my in-laws live.

              The EU pressure on Ireland to rerun referenda is seen as undemocratic for this reason:

              You ask people ' do you want bla bla bla ', then they say 'no', then you ask them 'are you sure?', and then when you get the answer you want you stop asking them.

              Following your argument it's democratic to hold an election every 5 years until you get the MPs elected that you want and then you don't hold any more elections.
              As I understand it the Irish live in a democracy where they can elect a government that gives them a third referendum if that's what they want.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                As I understand it the Irish live in a democracy where they can vote to be in the EU repeatedly until they give a yes vote.
                FTFY
                Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

                No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  It's extremely democratic; you ask people ' do you want bla bla bla ', then they say 'no', then you ask them 'are you sure?'


                  Seriously? Is that why they do it?

                  I find it very hard to believe that you genuinely think that's true.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post


                    Seriously? Is that why they do it?

                    I find it very hard to believe that you genuinely think that's true.
                    No, because I don't agree with referenda, but why is it so difficult to say 'no' twice? Do YOU find that difficult? I don't.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      on what - the existence of the Monarchy. Why not but don't be surprised if the royal company become more political. I'm reasonably happy with the status Quo and apart from a few Guardian journalists I think I'm in the majority.

                      On who is in the Government - we do and it keeps them in check.

                      On the EU - we haven't had a vote on whether we want them to rule us. So yes please!
                      I'm sure you are in the majority on the monarchy and the way we test that in a democracy is to have a popular vote.

                      We could have a vote every 7 years perhaps:

                      Should the current Queen remain as monarch or should the monarchy be abolished (or an alternative 'No' option).

                      Then when a monarch dies, the accession of the new monarch could be ratified by a popular vote. I really don't see how anyone who believes in democracy could object to this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X