• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The big fat "U.S. hypocrisy over everything" thread

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The big fat "U.S. hypocrisy over everything" thread

    Let's start with:

    U.S. hypocrisy over Russia's anti-gay laws - The Washington Post
    It is Utah that prohibits “the advocacy of homosexuality.” Arizona prohibits portrayals of homosexuality as a “positive alternative life-style” and has legislatively determined that it is inappropriate to even suggest to children that there are “safe methods of homosexual sex.” Alabama and Texas mandate that sex-education classes emphasize that homosexuality is “not a lifestyle acceptable to the general public.” Moreover, the Alabama and Texas statutes mandate that children be taught that “homosexual conduct is a criminal offense” even though criminalizing private, consensual homosexual conduct has been unconstitutional since 2003.
    <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

    #2
    So you can't call out a fault unless you're perfect? "He who is without sin cast the first stone" and all that (which is about vengeful accusations not justice anyway) but no country is free from homophobia to some degree. Calling up the laws in some US states as the reason the nation shouldn't speak out about the institutionalised abuse in Russia is silly.

    If you followed your own arguments, you'd not have posted this thread because you're probably a hypocrite sometimes.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #3
      In the same way that we had Section 28 - which William Hague made a three-line whip to vote in favour of keeping it when he was party leader. Perhaps that's why the FCO has remained fairly quiet over Russia's laws.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
        In the same way that we had Section 28 - which William Hague made a three-line whip to vote in favour of keeping it when he was party leader. Perhaps that's why the FCO has remained fairly quiet over Russia's laws.
        Rather ironic considering the rumours over Hague
        Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

        No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

        Comment


          #5


          Nicely done.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment

          Working...
          X