Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Six-year-old schoolboy suspended for having Mini Cheddars in his lunchbox
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
You find the outdoors disturbing? That explains a lot....While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.' -
Yes I'm Scottish. I drink litres of beer and gorge my way through deep fried mars bars.Originally posted by doodab View PostYou find the outdoors disturbing? That explains a lot...."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
I have an urge for some mini cheddars now. Or at least a jaffa cake.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
FTFYOriginally posted by scooterscot View PostYes I'm Scottish. I drink litres of buckfast and gorge my way through deep fried mars bars.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Buckfast, beer, petrol, does it make any difference? As long as it gets the job done to help me forget.Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostFTFY"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Wasn't the child suspended for repeatedly breaking school rules rather than just having minichedders?
If you keep breaking rules you will be suspended, this is not unusual or new is it?Comment
-
In my mind the issue is more that the child was punished.
At his age it is extremely likely that it is his parents who are packing his lunch and ignoring the repeated requests / warnings over the contents. To exclude the child and mess up his learning seems wrong - I'd understand more if they decided to fine the parents or something.Comment
-
Promoting healthy eating - and pushing it strongly - is one thing. Making it a school rule that you're not allowed a snack seems ludicrous. The school should be able to do what they want in the food they provide though.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
My daughter's school does not allow sweets etc. in lunchboxes or for snacks. I think it is a good thing. Otherwise some parents will put in whatever is easiest to hand so sweets, cakes and other treats will be put in because it keeps the peace and is easy and cheap.
Ignoring the health issues, the sugar high kids then disrupt the class for everyone.
More and more children would then want to bring in packed lunch rather than have a school dinner because they can have cakes etc. then so the problem spirals.
Refusing this lazy get out causes the parents to think about healthy eating and gets them and their children into the habit of eating well which will help them for life.
So the benefits are a less disrupted classes so the education is more effective, healthier children which become healthier adults.
However, once these rules are in place they become rules so disobeying them will be treated the same way as disobeying any other rule.
The parents would have been told about these policies and are free to remove their child from the school if they object that strongly.Comment
-
Aside from the fact that the whole "sugar high" thing is a myth with no scientific evidence that it actually exists (and quite a lot that it's bollocks), we're talking about mini cheddars, which are savoury cheese flavoured biscuits, not sweets or cakes. They are no more unhealthy than having mayonnaise or butter in a sandwich, or a pepperami or similar meat snack or those squeezy yogurts targeted at kids. Banning them is ******* ridiculous, and suspending a kid for 4 days because of it even more so.Originally posted by MyUserName View PostMy daughter's school does not allow sweets etc. in lunchboxes or for snacks. I think it is a good thing. Otherwise some parents will put in whatever is easiest to hand so sweets, cakes and other treats will be put in because it keeps the peace and is easy and cheap.
Ignoring the health issues, the sugar high kids then disrupt the class for everyone.
More and more children would then want to bring in packed lunch rather than have a school dinner because they can have cakes etc. then so the problem spirals.
Refusing this lazy get out causes the parents to think about healthy eating and gets them and their children into the habit of eating well which will help them for life.
So the benefits are a less disrupted classes so the education is more effective, healthier children which become healthier adults.
However, once these rules are in place they become rules so disobeying them will be treated the same way as disobeying any other rule.
The parents would have been told about these policies and are free to remove their child from the school if they object that strongly.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment