What exactly are the UKIP policies?

[Flashman]

So much the same ideology as the SNP has for Scotland?

Yes. It's the principal of self determination.

"National aspirations must be respected; people may now be dominated and governed only by their own consent. Self determination is not a mere phrase; it is an imperative principle of action."
President Wilson 1919.

Is Scotland a separate nation or is it part of the British nation? Not for me to say. Let the Scots decide.....

[Flashman]

Well it's worked great for all the other parties, hasn't it? This is what Labour and the Tories specialise in: empty rhetoric, slogans, catchphrases, dreams, illusions, delusions. You cannot even tell them apart barring the fact they support taxing this group rather than that, and for this .%, rather than that .%. I'd love to know from a Tory what policies and principles define 'their' party.

I want a party offering minimal government. That ain't the Tories and never will be, not unless they're desperately clinging onto the power they so love.

Yup its pathetic. No wonder the election turnout is falling.

[SpontaneousOrder]

It has nothing to do with the parties though. It all comes down to the fact that people vote for whoever promises to give them 'free' tulip.
The problem is with the population at large who think that being part of a mob means that they can legitimately take what isn't theirs. Of course when everyone takes what isn't theirs from everyone else, then everyone in general is worse off. People don't seem to realise this and think that their 'free' tulip is really free.

Wanting a minimal government party is pointless because they'd never win. What you really want is a minimal government population. The parties and their policies are a red herring.

[AtW]

UKIP is pretty good at providing some free LULZ - thank you for that Mr Farage, everybody can laugh at you without any fear that you will get elected.

[Flashman]

UKIP is pretty good at providing some free LULZ - thank you for that Mr Farage, everybody can laugh at you without any fear that you will get elected.

More Lulz.

WATCH: Nigel Farage Gives UKIP Weather Forecast - Guy Fawkes' blog

[Flashman]

It has nothing to do with the parties though. It all comes down to the fact that people vote for whoever promises to give them 'free' tulip.
The problem is with the population at large who think that being part of a mob means that they can legitimately take what isn't theirs. Of course when everyone takes what isn't theirs from everyone else, then everyone in general is worse off. People don't seem to realise this and think that their 'free' tulip is really free.

Wanting a minimal government party is pointless because they'd never win. What you really want is a minimal government population. The parties and their policies are a red herring.

tend to agree with you. It will be difficult enough to get our independence from Brussels but take on the chav benefit scroungers? It'd be war !

[BrilloPad]

Sensible gun licensing...

Does that mean they are entirely banned?

[petergriffin]

Kick out the darkies and cloth-heads, put the unemployed into the workhouse, abolish the BBC (giving the licence fee money instead to the Daily Mail), and making it illegal to buy anything other than British-made products.

Oops I was getting confused with the BNP.

Alternatively, have a look here Brillo my mate..

What We Stand For

Don't confuse the BNP for the UKIP. The BNP are fascists. However disgusting and regrettable they are, they culturally miles beyond the UKIP and their supporters. Fascism has its own cultural background that goes back to radical socialism in Italy and France.

UKIP is nothing but the ultra-right wing of the Tories. Their dream is to be reabsorbed in the Conservative party in a position of strength, and I actually see that happening in the end.

[darmstadt]

The clues in the name. Independence. The revolutionary concept of leaving the EU and having our own British Government.

I love all this bashing the EU and blaming them for numerous problems, especially the people who spout on about unelected officials making the rules (not unlike the British civil service, but I digress.) The question I have to ask all these people is how do they feel about the World Trade Organisation, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank all three of which are dominated by the USA. Their decisions are made in secret, the people who head them are appointed behind closed doors, nobody elected them and nobody really knows anything about them: their politics, their beliefs or their intentions yet they make important, life and economical decisions on our behalf. This has created a world run by a handful of bankers and CEOs who nobody elected. If anything they affect your daily life much more than a handful of bureaucrats in Brussels...

[BrilloPad]

tend to agree with you. It will be difficult enough to get our independence from Brussels but take on the chav benefit scroungers? It'd be war !

What about the banker scroungers? They cost alot more than the chavs.