Originally posted by Gittins Gal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Labour's smoking ban killed the British pub
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Good! That's something we can both agree onOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
I agree too!
Comment
-
Where I used to live there were 5 local pubs and a couple of wine bars within half a mile of my house and they were all packed most of the time.
Where I live now there is a local pub that looks like a dump, I wouldn't go in it myself, but it seems to be doing OK.
Maybe it's where you live?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Jesus fook, I leave the room and you all start arguing with each other trying to make the same point.
it is a cretin wonderland in here.Comment
-
ftfyOriginally posted by minestrone View PostJesus fook, I leave the room and people discover they can get on with each other quite well.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
I agree tooOriginally posted by Platypus View PostGood! That's something we can both agree on

(even though you called me a moron)Comment
-
You're right, it's entirely reasonable that we shouldn't say fat people eat too much, because a small proportion of them have a medical condition.Originally posted by Gittins Gal View PostNo, could be some congenital condition and that would hardly be my fault would it? (or do the revisionists have it that no congenital condition exists that causes obesity?)
What an idiotic piece of reasoning, that is a tangent to a tangent from what was being discussed in the first place.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
He was being truthful.Originally posted by Gittins Gal View PostI agree too
(even though you called me a moron)"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why the McCann Review is the latest failure of the Loan Charge scandal Today 06:53
- What did Spring Statement 2026 say about mortgages? Yesterday 07:29
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Mar 4 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Mar 3 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Mar 3 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59

just realised who the poster is
Comment