• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Greed is Good!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Societies judge every day, usually in courts of law.
    Good , we are getting somewhere. You have (by accident) stumbled on a perfect example of how human beings collectively determine value and worth in society.. by law.
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
      My definition of a worthwhile human being is one that gives more than he takes
      What if one human being's need to take is greater and capacity to give is lesser than another human being?

      Comment


        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        So if you made all the rich people in Brazil the UK, the USA poor crime would drop?
        It depends what you mean by "make poor". If the same level per capita income were distributed more equitably then yes, up to a point I would expect crime to drop in line with that. And health to improve etc.

        I would think there is a point of "optimum" inequality beyond which further reduction would have it's own negative effects.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          Originally posted by sasguru View Post
          Societies judge every day, usually in courts of law.
          No a collective of individuals consider evidence presented to them and then reach a consensus based on evaluation and discussion
          Connect with me on LinkedIn

          Follow us on Twitter.

          ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

          Comment


            Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
            What if one human being's need to take is greater and capacity to give is lesser than another human being?
            You are the one who presumes to have established how worth is measured you tell us.
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              What if one human being's need to take is greater and capacity to give is lesser than another human being?
              Define 'need'
              Connect with me on LinkedIn

              Follow us on Twitter.

              ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

              Comment


                Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
                How can 'Society' judge - societies are collectives of individuals.
                How can a jury reach a verdict? Juries are collections of individuals.
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  Originally posted by doodab View Post
                  It depends what you mean by "make poor". If the same level per capita income were distributed more equitably then yes, up to a point I would expect crime to drop in line with that. And health to improve etc.

                  I would think there is a point of "optimum" inequality beyond which further reduction would have it's own negative effects.
                  Give an example. Why not go the whole hog and take the entire wage packet of Brazil and divide equally amongst everyone?
                  Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    You are the one who presumes to have established how worth is measured you tell us.
                    By my standard, they're of equal value because they're both humans. And by yours?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                      If I had to pay for them out of my own pocket then the answer is it depends on who "them" are, can I afford it? some context please.
                      Oh dear. You seem to have forgotten the content of your own post. You were talking about the worth of your children.
                      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X