• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Sarah Palin critical of the Pope for not being enough of an extremist nutjob

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by masonryan View Post
    Another person who has no idea what the laws of logic are.
    I have a pretty good grasp of logic, having studied formal logical systems rather a lot. Why don't you tell us which laws of logic you're talking about? There are rather a lot of them, and any or all of them can be optional in a given logical system.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      Originally posted by masonryan View Post
      So why should anyone listen to anything you say since you don't know anything, by your own admission.
      Well they don't have to if they don't want to.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by masonryan View Post
        Laws of logic have not, is my point. Do you agree? yes/no
        No
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
          Some fantastic artwork and music.
          plus the founders of modern science

          Comment


            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            No
            But you don't know anything. So why do you say no.

            Comment


              Originally posted by masonryan View Post
              But you don't know anything. So why do you say no.
              It's my best guess, although tomorrow I might have a different opinion if you're able to persaude me. Plus; you wanted a yes or no answer that's easier than the more complex answers about logical systems that Mr Doodab provides.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Well they don't have to if they don't want to.
                Who would listen to someone who admits they don't know anything?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  It's my best guess.
                  Why do you trust science to ever be correct when you don't think the laws of logic are absolute

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by masonryan View Post
                    But you don't know anything. So why do you say no.
                    You can agree with something without knowing. In fact, that's exactly what is required for your idea of a "god given conscience" to actually work.
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by doodab View Post
                      I have a pretty good grasp of logic, having studied formal logical systems rather a lot. Why don't you tell us which laws of logic you're talking about? There are rather a lot of them, and any or all of them can be optional in a given logical system.
                      I'm referring to the four fundamental laws of logic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X