Poppies used to be the commemorative simple of the loses in the First World War and following that the Seconded World War. I have always worn a poppy up until this year when it seems that it has been taken over by government propaganda promoting the legitimacy of the Iraq and Afghan occupations. I find this year’s adverts rather sickening and nothing about WW1 or WW2.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Red or white?
Collapse
X
-
"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
No.Originally posted by d000hg View PostIsn't the issue that the red one supports the principle of war in the first place, and white-wearers (while they may respect those who died) want to make it clear they do not condone war in the first place?
The white poppies are anti-war, but the red poppies are nothing to do with supporting the principle of war - they are about remembering those who died during wars, no matter what their nationality. Those people may have been conscripts or volunteers. It's not about remembering the war, it's about remembering the loss of life.Comment
-
I think honouring those who died in a war implicitly says that war is morally justified in the first place, would be the argument made?Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI don't think the red one supports the principle of war; it simply recognises that tulip happens, and when tulip happens, some people are brave enough to risk their lives and some of them die.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I haven't seen the adverts. Are they adverts promoting the wearing of poppies? If so, then it makes sense that they focus on Iraq and Afghanistan.Originally posted by Paddy View PostPoppies used to be the commemorative simple of the loses in the First World War and following that the Seconded World War. I have always worn a poppy up until this year when it seems that it has been taken over by government propaganda promoting the legitimacy of the Iraq and Afghan occupations. I find this year’s adverts rather sickening and nothing about WW1 or WW2.
The Poppy Appeal supports servicemen and their families. There are very few (none?) left from WWI, small numbers from WWII, there will be some more from the Korean, Falklands and Gulf wars, but still a growing number of families and servicemen needing support from recent and current conflicts.
I would guess that a large percentage of their expenditure is going to support those needing it after being involved in Iraq and Afghanistan, even if those conflicts have produced relatively low numbers of casualities. Therefore it would be more honest of them to talk about this when making their appeal.Comment
-
I think that's reading too much into a commemoration.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI think honouring those who died in a war implicitly says that war is morally justified in the first place, would be the argument made?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You have to admit it's all about pride, and pride in us taking part in the worst wars in history just seems distasteful to me. History is history, what happened happened, and nobody is denying it, but it's not disrespectful to the dead to dare question it. Quite the opposite in fact; I'd say it's disrespectful to the dead to perpetuate the same old lies, starting with the oft repeated "gave their lives".Originally posted by administrator View PostI don't see the red ones as glorifying war, just a mark of respect for those who experienced things most of us can't imagine and many of whom gave their lives in defence of the freedom we have today.
And that's the problem; the culture is very much one of you're with us or against us; you either wear the poppy with pride like every single person on TV seems duty bound to do for weeks before, or you're a traitorous communist pinko sympathiser - or something.
I do agree that the white poppyists are making a politicial point, so I don't support that either. But I also don't understand why people deny that the poppy is all about national pride in our warmongering past (and present), or glorifying war if you're going to put it that way, when it clearly is.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
No more than honouring a peace campaigner who was assassinated says that assassination is morally justified.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI think honouring those who died in a war implicitly says that war is morally justified in the first place, would be the argument made?
Don't forget about conscription and the firing sqauds in WWI.
The original article is about protestors in Canada. The Canadian armed forces major role over the past few decades has been to provide peacekeeping forces around the world. By trying to prevent wars, at the cost of their own lives sometimes, are they justifying war itself?Comment
-
This is all well and good, but there are 364 other days of the year to make these points.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostYou have to admit it's all about pride, and pride in us taking part in the worst wars in history just seems distasteful to me. History is history, what happened happened, and nobody is denying it, but it's not disrespectful to the dead to dare question it. Quite the opposite in fact; I'd say it's disrespectful to the dead to perpetuate the same old lies, starting with the oft repeated "gave their lives".
And that's the problem; the culture is very much one of you're with us or against us; you either wear the poppy with pride like every single person on TV seems duty bound to do for weeks before, or you're a traitorous communist pinko sympathiser - or something.
I do agree that the white poppyists are making a politicial point, so I don't support that either. But I also don't understand why people deny that the poppy is all about national pride in our warmongering past (and present), or glorifying war if you're going to put it that way, when it clearly is.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
The key is for humans to remove themselves of negative emotions such as anger, greed, and hatred.
With metta,
one day at a time 
Comment
-
Two poems accredited with the invention
andTake up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.
Moina MichaelOh! you who sleep in Flanders Fields,
Sleep sweet - to rise anew!
We caught the torch you threw
And holding high, we keep the Faith
With All who died.
so on the face of it suggests it means continuing the fight, but things change and its used for Remembrance.
White Poppy was introduced in 1993 for peace, and in my opinion could have a day of its own and should leave Remembrance day alone.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Today 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Yesterday 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22

Comment