• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

If I hadn't gone to private school...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    Poor DA went to private school and ended up at the bottom of the list. Oh dear.
    Just think where I would have been at a compreOiksive.

    There is a serious point here. It is interesting that this Kynaston guy seems to think that there should be a finite availability of decent schooling. his premise is that this should only be available for the bright and hardworking and not for the dull and lazy.
    What the private system has done is to enable the "dull and lazy" to get on in the world despite their shortcomings.

    If top quality private education can keep the dull and lazy from falling into poverty why not extend it to everyone?
    The whole point of education should be to find the good in children and build on it to give them the confidence and aspiration to get on in their lives. It is not to discriminate only with the bright and "obviously" talented.

    I have never understood why schools only ever seem to coach the first teams at sport. Many children want to play football, rugby or tennis yet unless they are naturally talented they are ignored. This should not be the case.

    T
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
      If top quality private education can keep the dull and lazy from falling into poverty why not extend it to everyone
      Because you can't. It's logically impossible. If you have 5,000,000 "educations" then either they are all the same (and hence the term "top quality" becomes meaningless as there is only one quality) or they are different, in which case only some of them are "top quality". A market that drives people to differentiate and innovate in order to compete more effectively isn't going to produce 5,000,000 identical educations, therefore only some of them will be top quality, and those ones will be able to charge more, thus remaining the preserve of the elite.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        Just think where I would have been at a special needs school.
        FTFY
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          Because you can't. It's logically impossible. If you have 5,000,000 "educations" then either they are all the same (and hence the term "top quality" becomes meaningless as there is only one quality) or they are different, in which case only some of them are "top quality". A market that drives people to differentiate and innovate in order to compete more effectively isn't going to produce 5,000,000 identical educations, therefore only some of them will be top quality, and those ones will be able to charge more, thus remaining the preserve of the elite.
          So why not make every school private and give people vouchers with which to spend. Why shouldn't every school have the highest standards of teaching and facilities. I am not talking about giving every child the same education I am talking about giving parents choices.
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
            So why not make every school private and give people vouchers with which to spend. Why shouldn't every school have the highest standards of teaching and facilities. I am not talking about giving every child the same education I am talking about giving parents choices.
            You would have thought that if any government would understand the importance of spending thousands of pounds each year on each pupil, it would have been this one.
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
              You would have thought that if any government would understand the importance of spending thousands of pounds each year on each pupil, it would have been this one.
              It would probably mean a huge battle with the teaching unions and the education authorities. Keith Joseph set about the idea under Thatchers government. I do not think the govt have the stomach for wholesale reform so they are sneaking it in through the academy system.
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                So why not make every school private and give people vouchers with which to spend. Why shouldn't every school have the highest standards of teaching and facilities. I am not talking about giving every child the same education I am talking about giving parents choices.
                The main problem is that these days there are so many more well-paid jobs available for degree qualified men, and even more so (compared to say 60 years ago) for women. So to attract teachers of the necessary calibre, you're competing with all these jobs and would have to pay salaries to match.

                There's no way this situation will improve until interactive virtual reality computer training courses, with a few inspirational tip-top teachers indirectly lecturing to thousands, are of sufficient quality to be used more widely in schools, at least as a supplement to mediocre teaching.
                Last edited by OwlHoot; 30 October 2013, 12:52.
                Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post

                  I have never understood why schools only ever seem to coach the first teams at sport. Many children want to play football, rugby or tennis yet unless they are naturally talented they are ignored. This should not be the case.

                  T
                  I agree, but you have to remember that in England, there's a luxury of numbers in rugby; New Zealand achieves more (relative to playing numbers) in rugby because they have the systems to develop every kid to his maximum ability, largely because with less people, they have to do that to compete at the highest level. English schools don't necessarily have to bother; a bunch of talented kids are available for the firsts, so they get the best coaching as that gives the coach a feeling of prestige. I'm a case in point; not particularly 'talented' and the only reason I ended up playing at a higher standard than anyone from my schooldays is perhaps that at 15 I fell out with the school rugby coaches and went to play for a good nearby club that gave me the coaching that allowed me to outgrow my relative lack of talent. I never played for my school 1st XV, always either in the 2nds or on the reserve bench, but a few years later I played in the English 2nd division then played for some first class 7s teams that won some major tournaments. Of course, I was subjected to a tough regime of training and selection and had to fight to prove I was worth it, while some of the supposedly talented kids didn't. They got a shock when they left school and tried to break through in good clubs as they weren't physically prepared and their talent was not much more than being a moderately sized fish in a very small pond.

                  It looks to me like Wales have got their youth system in order though, anyway, I'm getting off topic.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    So why not make every school private and give people vouchers with which to spend. Why shouldn't every school have the highest standards of teaching and facilities. I am not talking about giving every child the same education I am talking about giving parents choices.
                    A very worthy idea, but it might unwittingly perpetuate the current problems, as it relies on the ability of parents to make good choices; like it or not, some are very good at that, and some aren't.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      I agree, but you have to remember that in England, there's a luxury of numbers in rugby; New Zealand achieves more (relative to playing numbers) in rugby because they have the systems to develop every kid to his maximum ability, largely because with less people, they have to do that to compete at the highest level. English schools don't necessarily have to bother; a bunch of talented kids are available for the firsts, so they get the best coaching as that gives the coach a feeling of prestige. I'm a case in point; not particularly 'talented' and the only reason I ended up playing at a higher standard than anyone from my schooldays is perhaps that at 15 I fell out with the school rugby coaches and went to play for a good nearby club that gave me the coaching that allowed me to outgrow my relative lack of talent. I never played for my school 1st XV, always either in the 2nds or on the reserve bench, but a few years later I played in the English 2nd division then played for some first class 7s teams that won some major tournaments. Of course, I was subjected to a tough regime of training and selection and had to fight to prove I was worth it, while some of the supposedly talented kids didn't. They got a shock when they left school and tried to break through in good clubs as they weren't physically prepared and their talent was not much more than being a moderately sized fish in a very small pond.

                      It looks to me like Wales have got their youth system in order though, anyway, I'm getting off topic.
                      Nothing wrong with that
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X