Originally posted by doodab
View Post
There is a serious point here. It is interesting that this Kynaston guy seems to think that there should be a finite availability of decent schooling. his premise is that this should only be available for the bright and hardworking and not for the dull and lazy.
What the private system has done is to enable the "dull and lazy" to get on in the world despite their shortcomings.
If top quality private education can keep the dull and lazy from falling into poverty why not extend it to everyone?
The whole point of education should be to find the good in children and build on it to give them the confidence and aspiration to get on in their lives. It is not to discriminate only with the bright and "obviously" talented.
I have never understood why schools only ever seem to coach the first teams at sport. Many children want to play football, rugby or tennis yet unless they are naturally talented they are ignored. This should not be the case.
T
Comment