Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This terrorist stuff in Kenya
Collapse
X
-
-
So perhaps you should take a more balanced view of things? There are 1.5 billion + Muslims as well as over 2 billion Christians. The most influential figures in history remain Jesus and Mohammed (even according to Time). There must be some value in their respective messages to command such a huge following after 2000 years.Originally posted by amcdonald View PostI probably would, but then we are where we areComment
-
We don't need to belive in a deity to have a moral compass or have a functioning society, that time has passedOriginally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostSo perhaps you should take a more balanced view of things? There are 1.5 billion + Muslims as well as over 2 billion Christians. The most influential figures in history remain Jesus and Mohammed (even according to Time). There must be some value in their respective messages to command such a huge following after 2000 years.
Life doesn't have to be that simplistic anymore
And just because something is popular doesn't make it right
I was brought up with all that religious mumbo jumbo, let it go the world needs to changeLast edited by amcdonald; 1 October 2013, 09:03.Doing the needful since 1827Comment
-
It is impossible to define universal morality except through a religion. The very idea of morality requires religion is a point of reference. Your idea of morality is very different to somebody who lives in the jungle or somebody who lives in another culture. The only way to bring the two together is through religion.Originally posted by amcdonald View PostWe don't need to belive in a deity to have a moral compass or have a functioning society, that time has passed
Life doesn't have to be that simplistic anymore
And just because something is popular doesn't make it rightComment
-
Ah the Asimov ideaOriginally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostIt is impossible to define universal morality except through a religion. The very idea of morality requires religion is a point of reference. Your idea of morality is very different to somebody who lives in the jungle or somebody who lives in another culture. The only way to bring the two together is through religion.
We need a crux to mould our world view round because we're too simple as a species to cope with realityDoing the needful since 1827Comment
-
It is the religous leaders that need to be targeted. The texts of most religions were written thousands of years ago and religions need to evolve to become more current. There is a lot in the bible that isn't applicable in the modern world. The Qur'an and the Haddith both talk about rewarding those who fight in the name of Allah, when they were written the levels of massacre we have witnessed in the last 15 years were not possible. It is the duty of the religious leaders to ensure followers do not blindly follow these words, but provide modern day interpretations to prevent the extremism we have seen. This is one thing Christianity has done well, it has evolved teachings to fit into modern day society, but if you look over history, Christians were anything but tolerant of other religions.Comment
-
The Quran makes no reference to sword at any point in time, you would think that if violence was so fundamental it mention sword, how to kill, when to kill etc. The reality is that there is a fanatical interpretation currently funded by Saudi (It's no coincidence that the rise of extremism has occurred at the same time as Saudi has become super wealthy due to oil)Originally posted by RedSauce View PostIt is the religous leaders that need to be targeted. The texts of most religions were written thousands of years ago and religions need to evolve to become more current. There is a lot in the bible that isn't applicable in the modern world. The Qur'an and the Haddith both talk about rewarding those who fight in the name of Allah, when they were written the levels of massacre we have witnessed in the last 15 years were not possible. It is the duty of the religious leaders to ensure followers do not blindly follow these words, but provide modern day interpretations to prevent the extremism we have seen. This is one thing Christianity has done well, it has evolved teachings to fit into modern day society, but if you look over history, Christians were anything but tolerant of other religions.
The extreme ideology has infiltrated and influenced Muslims around the world due to money and nothing else.Comment
-
YOU don't, but some people feel they do and you'll struggle to persuade them otherwise. And why would you, if the vast majority are doing you no harm at all?Originally posted by amcdonald View PostWe don't need to belive in a deity to have a moral compass or have a functioning society, that time has passed
I'm not religious either, but I think it's just too simplistic to suggest that nobody needs religion.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Well that and the Nazis...Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View PostThe Quran makes no reference to sword at any point in time, you would think that if violence was so fundamental it mention sword, how to kill, when to kill etc. The reality is that there is a fanatical interpretation currently funded by Saudi (It's no coincidence that the rise of extremism has occurred at the same time as Saudi has become super wealthy due to oil)
The extreme ideology has infiltrated and influenced Muslims around the world due to money and nothing else.Doing the needful since 1827Comment
-
Even if it were true then that would strengthen my point even more i.e. it is a political ideology backed with money from Saudi that has it's origins in Nazism. That is actually a load of tosh. It goes back a bit further than that to "scholars" who twisted the religion for political objectives. Not too dissimilar to Zionism and Christian-Zionism.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Comment