• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

This terrorist stuff in Kenya

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
    If you were alive at that time would you be saying the opposite to what you are now?
    I probably would, but then we are where we are
    Doing the needful since 1827

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
      I probably would, but then we are where we are
      So perhaps you should take a more balanced view of things? There are 1.5 billion + Muslims as well as over 2 billion Christians. The most influential figures in history remain Jesus and Mohammed (even according to Time). There must be some value in their respective messages to command such a huge following after 2000 years.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
        So perhaps you should take a more balanced view of things? There are 1.5 billion + Muslims as well as over 2 billion Christians. The most influential figures in history remain Jesus and Mohammed (even according to Time). There must be some value in their respective messages to command such a huge following after 2000 years.
        We don't need to belive in a deity to have a moral compass or have a functioning society, that time has passed

        Life doesn't have to be that simplistic anymore

        And just because something is popular doesn't make it right

        I was brought up with all that religious mumbo jumbo, let it go the world needs to change
        Last edited by amcdonald; 1 October 2013, 09:03.
        Doing the needful since 1827

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
          We don't need to belive in a deity to have a moral compass or have a functioning society, that time has passed

          Life doesn't have to be that simplistic anymore

          And just because something is popular doesn't make it right
          It is impossible to define universal morality except through a religion. The very idea of morality requires religion is a point of reference. Your idea of morality is very different to somebody who lives in the jungle or somebody who lives in another culture. The only way to bring the two together is through religion.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
            It is impossible to define universal morality except through a religion. The very idea of morality requires religion is a point of reference. Your idea of morality is very different to somebody who lives in the jungle or somebody who lives in another culture. The only way to bring the two together is through religion.
            Ah the Asimov idea

            We need a crux to mould our world view round because we're too simple as a species to cope with reality
            Doing the needful since 1827

            Comment


              #76
              It is the religous leaders that need to be targeted. The texts of most religions were written thousands of years ago and religions need to evolve to become more current. There is a lot in the bible that isn't applicable in the modern world. The Qur'an and the Haddith both talk about rewarding those who fight in the name of Allah, when they were written the levels of massacre we have witnessed in the last 15 years were not possible. It is the duty of the religious leaders to ensure followers do not blindly follow these words, but provide modern day interpretations to prevent the extremism we have seen. This is one thing Christianity has done well, it has evolved teachings to fit into modern day society, but if you look over history, Christians were anything but tolerant of other religions.

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by RedSauce View Post
                It is the religous leaders that need to be targeted. The texts of most religions were written thousands of years ago and religions need to evolve to become more current. There is a lot in the bible that isn't applicable in the modern world. The Qur'an and the Haddith both talk about rewarding those who fight in the name of Allah, when they were written the levels of massacre we have witnessed in the last 15 years were not possible. It is the duty of the religious leaders to ensure followers do not blindly follow these words, but provide modern day interpretations to prevent the extremism we have seen. This is one thing Christianity has done well, it has evolved teachings to fit into modern day society, but if you look over history, Christians were anything but tolerant of other religions.
                The Quran makes no reference to sword at any point in time, you would think that if violence was so fundamental it mention sword, how to kill, when to kill etc. The reality is that there is a fanatical interpretation currently funded by Saudi (It's no coincidence that the rise of extremism has occurred at the same time as Saudi has become super wealthy due to oil)

                The extreme ideology has infiltrated and influenced Muslims around the world due to money and nothing else.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
                  We don't need to belive in a deity to have a moral compass or have a functioning society, that time has passed
                  YOU don't, but some people feel they do and you'll struggle to persuade them otherwise. And why would you, if the vast majority are doing you no harm at all?

                  I'm not religious either, but I think it's just too simplistic to suggest that nobody needs religion.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
                    The Quran makes no reference to sword at any point in time, you would think that if violence was so fundamental it mention sword, how to kill, when to kill etc. The reality is that there is a fanatical interpretation currently funded by Saudi (It's no coincidence that the rise of extremism has occurred at the same time as Saudi has become super wealthy due to oil)

                    The extreme ideology has infiltrated and influenced Muslims around the world due to money and nothing else.
                    Well that and the Nazis...
                    Doing the needful since 1827

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
                      Well that and the Nazis...
                      Even if it were true then that would strengthen my point even more i.e. it is a political ideology backed with money from Saudi that has it's origins in Nazism. That is actually a load of tosh. It goes back a bit further than that to "scholars" who twisted the religion for political objectives. Not too dissimilar to Zionism and Christian-Zionism.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X