Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Makes me mad, it really does
Collapse
X
-
I don't think anything would.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Possibly but I am damn sure that wouldn't. There you are perhaps that's the answer - let the victim (or their family in the case of murder) decide the sentence/punishment for the perpetratorOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI don't think anything would.Comment
-
I don't really but since you see fit to impose your uninformed ramblings on here I am forced to respondOriginally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostDo you know, Sasguru, I find it incredibly humbling that someone such as yourself would take even the smallest interest in me
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Comment
-
whoa I was talking about locking people up because they haven't paid their TV licence. Forced deduction from benefits / PAYE / Interest or setting the Debt Collectors on them being far cheaper to arrange.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI am not sure reducing the benefits of a convicted murder would go very far towards assuaging the grief of the victims' families.
ILife meaning Life and murders being treated humanely but sparsely sounds good to me.
I'm all for clear plexiglass cells that you can just stand up in, porridge / vegetable soup and limited exit from their cell, but starving them & working them to death reeks of "Arbeitslager".Comment
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI am not sure reducing the benefits of a convicted murder would go very far towards assuaging the grief of the victims' families.I didn't think we locked people up for several decades just to try and make their victims' families happy.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI don't think anything would.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Neither did I.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI didn't think we locked people up for several decades just to try and make their victims' families happy.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
that's right. you cut their balls off or hang them by the thumbs with piano wire for that.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI didn't think we locked people up for several decades just to try and make their victims' families happy.
it's always important to murder good Christians - you have a much better chance of being forgiven
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment