Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Splitting the Bills
Collapse
X
-
Dear dinner challenged , I agree with you."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
No wonder she's on the game. That won't even cover her heroin bill.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostI pay for everything and give the missus an allowance of £1200 per month.Comment
-
It is a bit of a challenge sometimes, my Kids kept telling me what 'Mummy had bought them' when they were younger. Eventually we had a discussion and Mrs V explained to them where the money had come from. Both sides can be bad at that.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostI have no problem with men paying mortgage and bills and the woman staying at home with the kids/working part time (or vice versa although it seldom happens) as long as both partners are happy with the arrangement and the sharing of the money earned isn't a point of contention or a control tool. But unfortunately such arrangements, when things do go wrong, result in the sort of threads we see too often where suddenly the money is "mine" and she's a money-grabbing bitch for expecting to come out of the marriage with half a house when she didn't pay for it.
The problem frequently in marriage break ups is that one side wants to walk away with more than the other and frequently more than a dispassionate observer would consider fair.
There does seem to be a perception that the larger earner should subsidise the lower earner for the rest of their life. Where kids are involved that sometimes makes sense.
But if a millionaire marries a penniless person who never brings any money into the marriage and there are no children from the marriage why is that person entitled to a life of comfort at divorce?Comment
-
We've had a joint account since we got married. There is no concept of what is "my" money and what is "hers".Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Ouch just think how much better your lungs will be?Originally posted by rhubarb View PostWhich is somewhat annoying seeing as I've had to give up due to impending bench time,meaning I can't afford to smoke.Comment
-
Mrs OG works 3 days per week. I am on NMW. I have 2 shares in MyCo. She has 1 share. Mortgage comes out of my account. Everything else we just muddle through.Originally posted by mudskipper View PostI have no problem with men paying mortgage and bills and the woman staying at home with the kids/working part time (or vice versa although it seldom happens) as long as both partners are happy with the arrangement and the sharing of the money earned isn't a point of contention or a control tool. But unfortunately such arrangements, when things do go wrong, result in the sort of threads we see too often where suddenly the money is "mine" and she's a money-grabbing bitch for expecting to come out of the marriage with half a house when she didn't pay for it.Comment
-
Mrs MUN works 7 days a week. 2 days as a primary school teacher and 5 as a mother of two kids, one of them mildly autistic.Comment
-
You abandon your kids 2 days a week!Originally posted by MyUserName View PostMrs MUN works 7 days a week. 2 days as a primary school teacher and 5 as a mother of two kids, one of them mildly autistic.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Previously BGG paid the lion’s share when he was the major bread winner, but our situations have now changed, and now I cover the majority.
We both pay into a joint account to cover bills, then what’s left in individual accounts is spending cash
Happy to say that its worked for us over the last 23 years, but everyone is different.Growing old is mandatory
Growing up is optionalComment
-
Good lord NO!!!Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostYou abandon your kids 2 days a week!
I abandon them 7 days a week.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Today 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Yesterday 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment