Interesting story that TheMonkey. Much the same thing happened in the gunpowder plot. 5th September, 9th September. Too much of a coincidence that. Maybe it was Fawkes that did both.
-
bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson) -
"The most strange part is that the building nearby caught fire and collapsed, the only time in history that steel framed bullrings have collapsed due to fire."
True. Mind you that could probably due to the fact that this is the first time in history that they have been hit in the face with a couple of planesComment
-
1984... The UK is airstrip 1.Originally posted by ladymuckScience isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Haha, DOH!Originally posted by John Galt
MailmanComment
-
Also another interestingly amusing story about the twin towers collapse. Lots of people thought it would be great to archive their backup tapes in basement storage. Whoops.Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...Comment
-
Urr no, there was a incident in Madrid where a plane hit a tall steel frame building and it burnt for 32 hours and didn’t collapse. A similar incident in Amsterdam when a plane hit and bloke of flats and caused a fire, the aircraft was fully fuelled and flats nit not collapse under the fire. There have been other incidents in India and China, none of the buildings collapsed.Originally posted by John Galt
Further more tests with aviation fuel show that en under pressure it can not reach the temperatures that melted the steel within 90 minutes that it was alleged at the WTC. Only thermal lances are capable of doing that.
My guess is that there were thermal devices smuggled and fitted on the aircraft, and explosives already fitted to the basement of the building. I think the security services knew about it but they did nothing in the interests of using the incident for the convenience of US foreign policy.HEALTH WARNING. IT Can Damage your Health. Free Advice. Advice in the forum is the £9,995 version. By reading the health warning you are agreeing to the terms and conditions. Advice maybe bad as well as good. 24 months interest free. Your home is at risk if you don’t keep up payments. Advice limited to availability.Comment
-
Originally posted by John Galt
Apart from the obvious fact that, World Trade Centre 7, Didn't have a plane hit it! So it did fall down due to a small fire. Even though they had sprinklers fitted some time ago.
-Where was the plane wreckage from the pentagon? Disintegrated? There was 12 tonnes of titanium!!!!!
-Why was there £3.6 billion insurance taken out to cover the WTC buildings.........From a terrorist attack? ...........6 weeks before 9/11
-Why were "put option" 11 x higher then ever before put on American Airlines stock going down.
Just watch the film, then tell us it isn't true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money Money Money
Oh for heavens sake don't keep on
Comment
-
WTC has always had full terrorism coverage since April 1993 when Bin Laden and his merry men first tried to destroy itOriginally posted by Money Money Money
Comment
-
Is there an invasion of silly trolls going on?Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
Comment