Originally posted by suityou01
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Need to hire someone
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
It's a coding role, the job spec is "can you code" and "do you know Java, web services, etc".Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
You see that suity, that's you that is.while the under paid stuff doers crack on and cobble something together that vaguely passes the UAT tests.Comment
-
Only the ones who aren't good enough.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostI would give up searching because you´re basically excluding most of the best Java programmers.
Most people seem to be assuming I'm just trying to be "clever" while looking for someone to build a common or garden database backed business application or do some XML manipulation or some other BAU task with a preexisting tool or framework. That isn't what we're doing, and while we're obviously not ruling out people who can do that stuff, we need to filter them because a surprising number of people who can use those sorts of tools effectively simply don't know where to start with a problem that hasn't already been half solved.
No, we're not looking for someone to solve that specific problem at all. It's a leading question. I'm asking that to gain insight into how people go about clarifying requirements and solving problems, and how good they are at looking at completely abstract problems. The expectation is that if they have a good approach to solving that problem, and good background knowledge, that will transfer to other problems.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostYou´r looking exclusively for a good Java progranmer who solved that problem last week.
Question #2, for those who are interested:
How would you marshall and unmarshall java objects to/from XML if you aren't allowed to use JAXB or otherwise analyze schemas at compile time?Last edited by doodab; 17 July 2013, 18:07.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Hire me, I have absolutely no idea what you're on about but I look good in a miniskirt and fishnets and can make a mean cup of tea
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
-
I'd port it all to .NET/C# it's all much simpler and you can hire devs easily for half the money.Originally posted by doodab View PostQuestion #2, for those who are interested:
How would you marshall and unmarshall java objects to/from XML if you aren't allowed to use JAXB or otherwise analyze schemas at compile time?
HTH BIDIComment
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI'd port it all to .NET/C# it's all much simpler and you can hire devs easily for half the money.
HTH BIDI
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
-
So how would you Marshall and unmarshall xml in .net without generating classes from schemas at compile time?Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI'd port it all to .NET/C# it's all much simpler and you can hire devs easily for half the money.
HTH BIDIWhile you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer x = new System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer(DoodabsObje ct.GetType());Originally posted by doodab View PostSo how would you Marshall and unmarshall xml in .net without generating classes from schemas at compile time?
x.Serialize(Console.Out, DoodabsObject);Last edited by mudskipper; 17 July 2013, 21:04. Reason: Dunno why the stupid thing keeps sticking in a non-existent spaceComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05


Comment