• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

When do you give up on a book?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    When you say a proper book...
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #42
      must admit heavy going books like Art of War I download librivox recordings and play in the background, some stuff goes in.
      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        When you say a proper book...


        Ok, published book.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
          I've enjoyed most of the Booker shortlist books I've read. White Teeth was a great read. One I really couldn't be bothered with was Damon Galgut "In a strange room" He kept switching from first to third person - sometimes within the same sentence. As a 'literary device' it was damned irritating!

          Hobbit is one I gave up on as a kid.
          I enjoyed The Hobbit as a kid and again when a student.

          Couldn't cope with LOTR though. It appeared to me that they would miraculously get out of one scrape just to get into another, which they would in an equally improbably fashion escape from. I got bored with that pretty quickly.
          Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by Sysman View Post
            I enjoyed The Hobbit as a kid and again when a student.

            Couldn't cope with LOTR though. It appeared to me that they would miraculously get out of one scrape just to get into another, which they would in an equally improbably fashion escape from. I got bored with that pretty quickly.
            +1

            Just finished reading The Hobbit with my children, who were enthralled by it.

            I have no intention of trying LOTR again.
            Best Forum Advisor 2014
            Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
            Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
              I can put up with a book being a bit tulip and badly written but when writers start relying on lazy clichés I generally give up.
              I ripped through several of Wilbur Smith's books in my thirties then got frustrated with reading the same phrases again.

              I don't think I've come across another writer who used the word "shard" so much.
              Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by Sysman View Post
                I enjoyed The Hobbit as a kid and again when a student.

                Couldn't cope with LOTR though. It appeared to me that they would miraculously get out of one scrape just to get into another, which they would in an equally improbably fashion escape from. I got bored with that pretty quickly.
                Lord of the Rings almost ends up being two separate stories. One, following the hobbits on their way to destroy the ring is a similar (although darker) type of adventure as The Hobbit, with them attempting to overcome impossible odds. As a kid, that was the part I liked best.

                The other story is about Gandalf and Aragorn trying to rally the armies of Middle Earth to fight Sauron, to distract him and give Frodo and Sam a chance. When I've re-read it recently this is the part I've enjoyed more. I suppose that's why it's remained so popular, something for everyone(ish).

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by zeitghost
                  Have I () mentioned how much I hate Lord of the Flies?

                  Though that may be pure prejudice because it was a set book.
                  The Scottish Play was a set book and it was usefully on telly the night before the exam.

                  And then repeated until I got sick of it.

                  And my local playhouse proudly announced they'd be doing Shakespeare in English, and would I like to come along?

                  Guess which play?

                  No was the answer.
                  Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
                    Lord of the Rings almost ends up being two separate stories. One, following the hobbits on their way to destroy the ring is a similar (although darker) type of adventure as The Hobbit, with them attempting to overcome impossible odds. As a kid, that was the part I liked best.

                    The other story is about Gandalf and Aragorn trying to rally the armies of Middle Earth to fight Sauron, to distract him and give Frodo and Sam a chance. When I've re-read it recently this is the part I've enjoyed more. I suppose that's why it's remained so popular, something for everyone(ish).
                    Not forgetting Merry and Pippin's story where they inadvertantly cause Saruman's downfall.

                    I loved all of the Middle Earth books. I read The Hobbit first as a lad and then moved on to TLOTR. I then moved on to The Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales. My biggest regret is what Jackson did to them, but, I guess he thought he could right a better story.

                    I read Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code and when I finished it I found that I'd finally found a book that deserved to be burnt.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by zeitghost
                      Have I () mentioned how much I hate Lord of the Flies?

                      Though that may be pure prejudice because it was a set book.
                      Pure prejudice, I think.

                      I read Lord of the Flies about two weeks ago for the very first time. Really enjoyed it. I do think it's overrated, but nonetheless a decent read.

                      Once the kids in the book start to return to a state of primordial human savagery it reminded me so much of CUK General.
                      nomadd liked this post

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X