Rolling Stones at Glastonbury

[DaveB]

Still got it musically, but Christ they look like the walking dead. Keith looks like an animated Voodoo doll and Charlie looked like he needed a Zimmer frame coming off after the first set.

[Doggy Styles]

Agreed.

Jagger and Wood didn't look too bad. And Bill Wyman was sporting a nice healthy tan.

They were still very good though, I suppose.

[administrator]

Definitely! Keith has looked like that since he was 34 though

I noticed Charlie was looking a bit stiff after the initial set - he is 72 though according to the font of all knowledge

[mudskipper]

Agreed.

Jagger and Wood didn't look too bad. And Bill Wyman was sporting a nice healthy tan.

They were still very good though, I suppose.

Liver failure?

[socialworker]

I thought Keith was a little too laid back, could have tried harder. I would have liked to hear more of that bass player. But Mick gave it his all, I thought he was superb and no allowance made for age.

[Archangel]

I thought they looked old when I saw them at roundhay park in 1982. But then I was a mere strip of a lad myself.

[suityou01]

When I first flicked over I thought it was a Wonga ad.

[zoco]

Blistering set.

Just an order of magnitude more superior on so many levels than the indie dirge that was Friday's main act and the folksie diddly-diddly nonsense of tonight's festival closers.

Edit: Bobby Womack over on the West Holts stage, now there's a class act. Gave Mick and the boys their first no. 1 hit he did.