• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Rolling Stones at Glastonbury"

Collapse

  • zoco
    replied
    Blistering set.

    Just an order of magnitude more superior on so many levels than the indie dirge that was Friday's main act and the folksie diddly-diddly nonsense of tonight's festival closers.

    Edit: Bobby Womack over on the West Holts stage, now there's a class act. Gave Mick and the boys their first no. 1 hit he did.
    Last edited by zoco; 30 June 2013, 21:30.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    When I first flicked over I thought it was a Wonga ad.

    Leave a comment:


  • Archangel
    replied
    I thought they looked old when I saw them at roundhay park in 1982. But then I was a mere strip of a lad myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • socialworker
    replied
    I thought Keith was a little too laid back, could have tried harder. I would have liked to hear more of that bass player. But Mick gave it his all, I thought he was superb and no allowance made for age.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    Agreed.

    Jagger and Wood didn't look too bad. And Bill Wyman was sporting a nice healthy tan.

    They were still very good though, I suppose.
    Liver failure?

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Definitely! Keith has looked like that since he was 34 though

    I noticed Charlie was looking a bit stiff after the initial set - he is 72 though according to the font of all knowledge

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Agreed.

    Jagger and Wood didn't look too bad. And Bill Wyman was sporting a nice healthy tan.

    They were still very good though, I suppose.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    started a topic Rolling Stones at Glastonbury

    Rolling Stones at Glastonbury

    Still got it musically, but Christ they look like the walking dead. Keith looks like an animated Voodoo doll and Charlie looked like he needed a Zimmer frame coming off after the first set.

Working...
X