Blistering set.
Just an order of magnitude more superior on so many levels than the indie dirge that was Friday's main act and the folksie diddly-diddly nonsense of tonight's festival closers.
Edit: Bobby Womack over on the West Holts stage, now there's a class act. Gave Mick and the boys their first no. 1 hit he did.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Rolling Stones at Glastonbury
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Rolling Stones at Glastonbury"
Collapse
-
I thought they looked old when I saw them at roundhay park in 1982. But then I was a mere strip of a lad myself.
Leave a comment:
-
I thought Keith was a little too laid back, could have tried harder. I would have liked to hear more of that bass player. But Mick gave it his all, I thought he was superb and no allowance made for age.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostAgreed.
Jagger and Wood didn't look too bad. And Bill Wyman was sporting a nice healthy tan.
They were still very good though, I suppose.
Leave a comment:
-
Definitely! Keith has looked like that since he was 34 though
I noticed Charlie was looking a bit stiff after the initial set - he is 72 though according to the font of all knowledge
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed.
Jagger and Wood didn't look too bad. And Bill Wyman was sporting a nice healthy tan.
They were still very good though, I suppose.
Leave a comment:
-
Rolling Stones at Glastonbury
Still got it musically, but Christ they look like the walking dead. Keith looks like an animated Voodoo doll and Charlie looked like he needed a Zimmer frame coming off after the first set.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: