• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Runaway Teacher Found Guilty

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by formant View Post

    I disagree with a fixed age of consent for teenagers. I believe it should be assessed on a case by case basis. Some, such as this one, are perfectly able to consent and understand what consent means.
    WHS - I recall was it the Daily Star or similar, had a countdown to Charlotte Church' 18th birthday? I didn't see any of those hacks being hauled up before a judge for harassing a child! The law as it stands says 17y 11m 3[0/1] days is illegal, 18y is fair game.
    Originally posted by Nigel Farage MEP - 2016-06-24 04:00:00
    "I hope this victory brings down this failed project and leads us to a Europe of sovereign nation states, trading together, being friends together, cooperating together, and let's get rid of the flag, the anthem, Brussels, and all that has gone wrong."

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
      WHS - I recall was it the Daily Star or similar, had a countdown to Charlotte Church' 18th birthday? I didn't see any of those hacks being hauled up before a judge for harassing a child! The law as it stands says 17y 11m 3[0/1] days is illegal, 18y is fair game.
      Because that's how law's work, they can only be black or white, we may not agree with them but its how its done, the judiciary gets the final say with the punishment, thats why doing 31 in a 30 zone nothing happens, do 131 in a 30 zone and you go to jail.
      Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
      I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

      I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
        WHS - I recall was it the Daily Star or similar, had a countdown to Charlotte Church' 18th birthday? I didn't see any of those hacks being hauled up before a judge for harassing a child! The law as it stands says 17y 11m 3[0/1] days is illegal, 18y is fair game.
        Your point stands, but IIRC it was a 15 year old with enormous knockers who wanted to go topless in the Star, which she did on her 16th birthday. Phwoar!

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
          WHS - I recall was it the Daily Star or similar, had a countdown to Charlotte Church' 18th birthday? I didn't see any of those hacks being hauled up before a judge for harassing a child! The law as it stands says 17y 11m 3[0/1] days is illegal, 18y is fair game.
          Um... isn't it 16 rather than 18?
          England's greatest sailor since Nelson lost the armada.

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Uncle Albert View Post
            Um... isn't it 16 rather than 18?
            Oh ... apparently it's 18 now, it was 16 until 2003

            Before 2003, British tabloids could legally feature 16- and 17-year-old girls as topless models. Samantha Fox, Maria Whittaker, Debee Ashby, and others began their topless modelling careers in the Sun when they were 16, while the Daily Sport was even known to count down the days until it could feature a girl topless on her 16th birthday, as it did with Linsey Dawn McKenzie in 1994. In 2003, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 raised the minimum legal age for topless modelling to 18.

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Platypus View Post
              Oh ... apparently it's 18 now, it was 16 until 2003

              Before 2003, British tabloids could legally feature 16- and 17-year-old girls as topless models. Samantha Fox, Maria Whittaker, Debee Ashby, and others began their topless modelling careers in the Sun when they were 16, while the Daily Sport was even known to count down the days until it could feature a girl topless on her 16th birthday, as it did with Linsey Dawn McKenzie in 1994. In 2003, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 raised the minimum legal age for topless modelling to 18.
              So presumably those pictures are now illegal? So the paper's archive sections would have had to remove them or risk charges being brought?
              "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

              https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

              Comment


                #67
                Stuart Hall got 15 months. Doesn't stack up really does it?

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by stek View Post
                  Stuart Hall got 15 months. Doesn't stack up really does it?
                  No, it really doesn't
                  Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
                  I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

                  I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by formant View Post
                    Sad story.

                    I mean, of course he's stupid (as is she). He had options (resigning, waiting till she's 16 to make it official, etc.) and he made poor choices. And it's unlikely to be a sustainable relationship.

                    But, for Christ's sake, I don't think I've seen a case like this before where the 'perpetrator' cared THAT much about having the girl's explicit consent.

                    I disagree with a fixed age of consent for teenagers. I believe it should be assessed on a case by case basis. Some, such as this one, are perfectly able to consent and understand what consent means.
                    He would have had to wait until she was 18 because he was in a position of responsibility. I'm not sure if quitting would change that or if the fact that he met her while he was a teacher would still have had some bearing.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Bunk View Post
                      He would have had to wait until she was 18 because he was in a position of responsibility. I'm not sure if quitting would change that or if the fact that he met her while he was a teacher would still have had some bearing.
                      Of course that does ignore the pertinent fact that the man is a ******* moron.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X