- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bring Back Proggy
Collapse
X
-
-
I very nearly gave SM his first neg rep for that.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostI miss him.......'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
My last two infractions were given by different moderators for the same post. One was a minor infraction, one was a ban.Originally posted by eek View PostThat implies that our mods are inconsistent, random, vendictive and petty. Who could say such a thing
Comment
-
In all seriousness, I think it's probably a banning offence to not make such threats.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostIn all seriousness, we could do with a clear ruling as to whether it's OK to make death threats towards MF.
Me, for one.Originally posted by eek View PostThat implies that our mods are inconsistent, random, vendictive and petty. Who could say such a thing
You only say that because you can't count higher than one.Originally posted by sasguru View PostAt least one of the mods exhibits signs of cretinism.
We had an investigation and found no evidence of any wrongdoing.*
* Because we didn't look very hard at all.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
GoodOriginally posted by TheFaQQer View PostMy last two infractions were given by different moderators for the same post. One was a minor infraction, one was a ban.

Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
As a demonstration of inconsistency and arbitrariness, I've reverse The FaQQer's ban.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
How marvellously randomOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostAs a demonstration of inconsistency and arbitrariness, I've reverse The FaQQer's ban.
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
-
-
I would have been better to correct the small infraction and turn it in to a ban as well, to be served with immediate effectOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostAs a demonstration of inconsistency and arbitrariness, I've reverse The FaQQer's ban.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Seriously?Originally posted by oscarose View PostWhy the banning?

Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Today 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Yesterday 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

one day at a time
Comment