So you've pulled Nigella Lawson...

[Old Hack]

God you're as thick as pig tulip aren't you.

The point is : Sometimes words and reasoning don't work and you have to resort to physical forms of defence. It really was rather naive of you to suggest that there is no place in this world for physical violence, even when used in self defence. According to you we should all stand there using our charm wit and charisma to stave off an attack.

That is my point.

Fook me I see what SAS was going on about now.

You dumb fat coont, no wonder people deride you as they do.

In defence to violence, of course there is a recourse to violence you twat, but to words? That's the point; even if NL was taking the piss out of saatchi, does that give good reason to his use of violence?

You really are some dickhead you know suity.

[Old Hack]

Did your mum and dad not have a telly?

Catholics

[Old Hack]

suity

If you’re linking MTT building himself up to defend himself, and not being able to use words to stop the violence. Please don’t think I can’t make this out, but it’s not the point we’re making. If you are faced with defending yourself from violence, with violence, it’s a bit different from using violence against words, no?

I hope you're not seriously doing that are you?

God you're as thick as pig tulip aren't you.

The point is : Sometimes words and reasoning don't work and you have to resort to physical forms of defence. It really was rather naive of you to suggest that there is no place in this world for physical violence, even when used in self defence. According to you we should all stand there using our charm wit and charisma to stave off an attack.

That is my point.

Fook me I see what SAS was going on about now.

I can’t believe you are so stupid; I even spelled in out in the quote you used. If you are faced with violence, then of course a valid defence is violence, but if you’re not faced with violence, but with words, can you justify violence? No, of course you can’t, if you’re evolved.

I cannot believe you even quoted me saying that very same thing, then called me stupid as you thought I’d not said it...

[suityou01]

You dumb fat coont, no wonder people deride you as they do.

In defence to violence, of course there is a recourse to violence you twat, but to words? That's the point; even if NL was taking the piss out of saatchi, does that give good reason to his use of violence?

You really are some dickhead you know suity.

Out of context vain and desperate attempt to regain some ground while reeling on the ropes. You really are a numpty.

Go back and look at your original comment. That there is no place for physical violence in this world when words and reasoning are available.

Then you go and say

In defence to violence, of course there is a recourse to violence

With no mention of words or reasoning. You are spinning around in small circles making absolutely no sense.

I'll be buggered if I'm going to get dragged into a 25 page bulltulip throwing contest as I have work to do, but you've done enough to satisfy me that you are an utter utter

[suityou01]

I can’t believe you are so stupid; I even spelled in out in the quote you used. If you are faced with violence, then of course a valid defence is violence, but if you’re not faced with violence, but with words, can you justify violence? No, of course you can’t, if you’re evolved.

I cannot believe you even quoted me saying that very same thing, then called me stupid as you thought I’d not said it...

Wrong quote dick head. You are flailing around contradicting yourself.

Knobber.

[Old Hack]

You dumb fat coont. It was in relation to proggy saying it could be justified if she'd been verbally abusing him all along.

Honestly suity, you should drink less mate, for you're deranged.

Can't believe how stupid you look mate.

[Old Hack]

That is true, however we don't know the first thing about their situation. Say for example a someone constantly taunts another person and psychologically bullies them for years. Then the victim snaps one day and grabs the bully by the neck? still assault but there you can understand the action.

No, sorry, but you can't. If you're incapable of standing your own ground intellectually, using words, then there's still no reason to try and use violence, that's just using force to make your point, and this doesn't belong in the real world. It's like when parents justify hitting their children.

I could understand, perhaps, if you have issues in this area maybe, and are empathising, but it doesn't make it right in anyway. All it means is he lacks the intellect to reason, and uses force instead.

All about saatchi suity

My you look stupid now. Well, in fairness, you've been doing so for a long time without my help

[bobspud]

In defence to violence, of course there is a recourse to violence you twat, but to words? That's the point; even if NL was taking the piss out of saatchi, does that give good reason to his use of violence?

Actually my daughter punched several shades of tulip out of another girl last week. This girl had been making her life hell for several years, through two schools and despite countless sessions with teachers listening to their bulltulip about recovery plans and not tolerating bullying etc. In the end the little tulip got a hard smack in the mouth and a black eye together with a load more crap from her parents.

Words are not a soft option. They hurt and can leave more scars than the dental work my daughter inflicted. What did this lesson teach my daughter? People that use mental aggravation as a weapon get away with it until you raise the price of their fun to something that is tangible.

However this is not what we are discussing in the case of Nigella and Charles. Whatever happened has resulted in a loss of temper with far reaching results for all concerned. Its not fair that Nigella has to deal with a press feeding frenzy as well as a serious relationship issue.

[Old Hack]

Actually my daughter punched several shades of tulip out of another girl last week. This girl had been making her life hell for several years, through two schools and despite countless sessions with teachers listening to their bulltulip about recovery plans and not tolerating bullying etc. In the end the little tulip got a hard smack in the mouth and a black eye together with a load more crap from her parents.

Words are not a soft option. They hurt and can leave more scars than the dental work my daughter inflicted. What did this lesson teach my daughter? People that use mental aggravation as a weapon get away with it until you raise the price of their fun to something that is tangible.

However this is not what we are discussing in the case of Nigella and Charles. Whatever happened has resulted in a loss of temper with far reaching results for all concerned. Its not fair that Nigella has to deal with a press feeding frenzy as well as a serious relationship issue.

Well, each parent has their own path, and as long as they’re happy on that path, that’s their call. I am trying, and it is hard, to teach my kids to use their own intellect if someone starts the verbals, but only to use violence, in defence.

I believe Saatchi lost the plot, and grabbed her, a few times. It's simply inexcusable.

[suityou01]

Well, each parent has their own path, and as long as they’re happy on that path, that’s their call. I am trying, and it is hard, to teach my kids to use their own intellect if someone starts the verbals, but only to use violence, in defence.

I believe Saatchi lost the plot, and grabbed her, a few times. It's simply inexcusable.

Glad you have your story straight now. Now you are spouting something I can agree with.