• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ok here's a question for you.......

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    VERY long prison sentences involving harsh conditions and hard labour (digging / breaking rocks etc). Min 5 years for petty crime, life for everything else.

    Now the main argument against this is cost and space, hence why I believe most of our prisons should be offshored to 3rd world locations (and I mean third world as well) where the cost and space issues are removed.

    Sorted.

    Comment


      #22
      Trouble is, our legal system (and that of other countries) has a solid history of executing people where the passage of time has proven them to be wholly innocent of their supposed crimes.

      Whilst it is convenient (both mentally and financially) to dispatch the neredowells, one has to wonder about the justice of the situation.

      What would have happened to the 'Guilford Four'? the 'Birmingham Six'?

      You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

      Comment


        #23
        Just as an aside: how about not releasing a prisoner until he can prove that he can read and write? Otherwise, there's not much point really...
        If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

        Comment


          #24
          Well bm

          Originally posted by bogeyman
          Trouble is, our legal system (and that of other countries) has a solid history of executing people where the passage of time has proven them to be wholly innocent of their supposed crimes.

          Whilst it is convenient (both mentally and financially) to dispatch the neredowells, one has to wonder about the justice of the situation.

          What would have happened to the 'Guilford Four'? the 'Birmingham Six'?

          If the giuildfour 4 had been convicted three times for seperate offences I would think they'd have to be bloody unlucky so an incorrect death sentence would just be in keeping with that general streak of bad luck, wouldn't you say?
          Why not?

          Comment


            #25
            Yeah, but what about the Renault 5?
            I remember the good old days of this site when people used to moan about serious contractor related issues like house prices and immigration. How times have changed!?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
              If the giuildfour 4 had been convicted three times for seperate offences I would think they'd have to be bloody unlucky so an incorrect death sentence would just be in keeping with that general streak of bad luck, wouldn't you say?
              Bloody bad luck I'd say.

              By the way, just because you committed crime X, doesn't mean you commited crime Y - does it?


              p.s. Guildford [Fleetwood]

              You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Dundeegeorge
                for killers/multiple rapists/recidivist paedophiles.
                1st offence - treatment in a secure environment for 5 years
                2nd offence - secure prison for 10 years
                3rd offence - death
                Society is entitled to protect itself.

                Surely the death penalty represents a light sentence.

                A real life sentence where the culprit faces a lifetime of incarceration with no prospect of freedom, ever, has to be the ultimate punishment.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by FrankScribe
                  Surely the death penalty represents a light sentence.

                  A real life sentence where the culprit faces a lifetime of incarceration with no prospect of freedom, ever, has to be the ultimate punishment.

                  Yeah, crucifiction's a doddle!

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Errm

                    Originally posted by bogeyman
                    Bloody bad luck I'd say.

                    By the way, just because you committed crime X, doesn't mean you commited crime Y - does it?


                    p.s. Guildford [Fleetwood]
                    No, it doesn't, but again, why is that significant?
                    Why not?

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by bogeyman
                      Bloody bad luck I'd say.

                      By the way, just because you committed crime X, doesn't mean you commited crime Y - does it?


                      p.s. Guildford [Fleetwood]
                      Everyone is guilty of something. The trick is in figuring out what.
                      "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X