Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Any mad, swivel-eyed loons on here?
Collapse
X
-
-
You say that, but once upon and time it was illegal. Then it was ok if you were over 25 and it was in private. Then it was ok if you were 21. Now it's ok if you're 18, and we all know it's been ok in the army for years.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostNobody is proposing that gay marriage is made compulsory of that is what you're worried about.Comment
-
Quite a good point IMO.Originally posted by vetran View Postthey gave the word Marriage away to the registry office marriages. If they hadn't done that then I would agree with you.
I agree however we discussed this a while back and apparently the CofE is obligated (literally or in practice) to marry people who want to be married, due to its links with the state (citation neededI'm happy to see the two legally harmonised with the church (of all flavours) allowed to abstain (individually) from providing ceremonies in church, after a while it will be like female bishops and the English church will eventually allow it, but that is a matter of conscience not legality.
). So it's already 'broken' in the sense they don't only marry believers which would make sense to me.
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
16, I think, but I may be wrong.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostYou say that, but once upon and time it was illegal. Then it was ok if you were over 25 and it was in private. Then it was ok if you were 21. Now it's ok if you're 18, and we all know it's been ok in the army for years.
Anyway, I was making a rather glib point before.Comment
-
they are explicitly excluding the CofE in the legislation, was curious why, now I know - thanks.Originally posted by d000hg View PostQuite a good point IMO.
I agree however we discussed this a while back and apparently the CofE is obligated (literally or in practice) to marry people who want to be married, due to its links with the state (citation needed
). So it's already 'broken' in the sense they don't only marry believers which would make sense to me.
I'm happy to make it a matter of conscience for all religions, it will slowly become standard for most religions. The less tolerant ones can be dealt with once the majority of churches & temples offer services for same sex marraiges.Comment
-
Unfortunately, as I understand it, C of E priests are not allowed to marry gay people, even if as a matter of conscience they choose to.Originally posted by vetran View Postthey are explicitly excluding the CofE in the legislation, was curious why, now I know - thanks.
I'm happy to make it a matter of conscience for all religions, it will slowly become standard for most religions. The less tolerant ones can be dealt with once the majority of churches & temples offer services for same sex marraiges.
On another note, I don't understand this argument that religions may be forced one day to marry gay people whether they want to or not. AFAIK, RC churches have not been forced to marry divorcees since the Divorce Act was introduced.
On yet another note, does anyone know the position on registrars of an RC faith, and whether they currently conduct marriages between divorcees?Comment
-
I believe that there will be a time when all religions will move towards equality and there will be some that hold out through bigotry, those will need to be regulated so it doesn't become an issue. I suspect a financial incentive will help.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostUnfortunately, as I understand it, C of E priests are not allowed to marry gay people, even if as a matter of conscience they choose to.
On another note, I don't understand this argument that religions may be forced one day to marry gay people whether they want to or not. AFAIK, RC churches have not been forced to marry divorcees since the Divorce Act was introduced.
On yet another note, does anyone know the position on registrars of an RC faith, and whether they currently conduct marriages between divorcees?
RC Divorce - well that is complete madness in say an abusive relationship.Comment
-
God appears to disagree:Originally posted by vetran View PostI believe that there will be a time when all religions will move towards equality and there will be some that hold out through bigotry, those will need to be regulated so it doesn't become an issue. I suspect a financial incentive will help.
RC Divorce - well that is complete madness in say an abusive relationship.
“Whoever divorces his wife and marries another, commits adultery against her and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery,” (Mark 10:11-12)Comment
-
I've never really got religious values.
gay marriage is a sin, but buggering young boys is acceptableDoing the needful since 1827Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostGod appears to disagree:He actually wrote that, I'm well impressed. How do gay animals, i.e. Pigeons, ducks and penguins stand in God's eyes?“Whoever divorces his wife and marries another, commits adultery against her and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery,” (Mark 10:11-12)“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Today 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Yesterday 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Yesterday 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13

Comment