Originally posted by MyUserName
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I am an atheist.
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
To gain more resources for themselves - e.g. suppliers will rip off customers, politicians fiddle their expenses, muppets use tax avoidance schemes, guys will lie through their teeth to get a hot girl into bed etc.Originally posted by original PM View Postwhy?Comment
-
Actually thats closer to Humanist. Atheists do not believe in the existance of God or other supernatural supreme being, spiritual or otherwise. Doesn't mean they all want to get on with each other and be happy.Originally posted by Paddy View PostIndeed not. Religious people think it’s OK to do harm as long as they confess their sins before they die, then they go to heaven. You can only go to heaven if you are a catholic.
Atheists believe the only life is the one we have on Earth therefore we should make the best of it and cooperate with our fellow human beings.
Humansts are Atheists who also believe that the best thing for the Human race is for everyone to cooperate for the greater good of humanity as a whole. (roughly paraphrased)."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Does that mean any atheist who isn't a jerk is automatically a humanist?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Hmmm ... maybe I suppose. The trouble is that someone who is a jerk to you might seem a nice fellow to someone else.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDoes that mean any atheist who isn't a jerk is automatically a humanist?
It looks like humanism is concerned with humans on a global scale (I might be wrong, I just scanned the wiki article!) so an atheist might well have localised humanistic beliefs but the fact they are localised would mean that they are not a humanist ... or something ....Comment
-
Quoting Wikipedia cos it's quicker.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDoes that mean any atheist who isn't a jerk is automatically a humanist?
Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance, which affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives. It stands for the building of a more humane society through an ethic based on human and other natural values in the spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities. It is not theistic, and it does not accept supernatural views of reality.
So not, not automatically. If you regard yourself as an atheist and agree with the above then yes, you could be called a Humanist. But you don't have to be, it's up to you, hence the bit about giving meaning and shape to your own life. It's your decision as to how you describe yourself without having to accept labels from others."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Probably.Originally posted by d000hg View PostDoes that mean any atheist who isn't a jerk is automatically a humanist?
I'm an atheist. I see little point in humanism. But of course, on paper, there's not really anything to dislike about their objectives. Somehow, I just have no interest in being part of a community on the basis of the faith I don't have.
Comment
-
I could say I have an ethical life stance based on ethics of "take what you can get"Originally posted by DaveB View PostQuoting Wikipedia cos it's quicker.
Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Shouldn't that be for agnosticsOriginally posted by MyUserName View PostThe only common thing that atheists believe is that religion has not satisfied it's burden of proof.
As you can't prove the non existence of something that doesn't exist. Athiests are surely a faith based religion!Doing the needful since 1827Comment
-
No, nostic or agnostic deals with knowledge. Theism and Atheism deal with believe.Originally posted by amcdonald View PostShouldn't that be for agnostics
As you can't prove the non existence of something that doesn't exist. Athiests are surely a faith based religion!
It depends how far you want to push the definitions. I am as agnostic about the Christian God as I am about any other god as I am about the tooth fairy.
Atheism is a religion in the same way as not playing golf is a hobby.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment