• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tits 'n' arse!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Simple solution; if you want to make people sit around and wait for 2 weeks before starting, pay them a retainer.
    And if he failed the drugs test / background check?
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
      And if he failed the drugs test / background check?
      YOU chose to check him, he chose not to bother.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        YOU chose to check him, he chose not to bother.
        He passed the checks. He just got offered something during the process.

        I'm picking up some animosity Mich? Is it because you're a stoner?
        What happens in General, stays in General.
        You know what they say about assumptions!

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
          He passed the checks. He just got offered something during the process.

          I'm picking up some animosity Mich? Is it because you're a stoner?
          No animosity, just suggesting that you remember what contracting's like; you wait for a while for a contract, get 'no' for silly reasons from agents and then three opportunities turn up at once. One of them is a tulipe rate, one of them demands you hang around waiting for 2 weeks (2 weeks! You could make some phone calls to earlier customers in 2 hours and find put if he's any good), one of them is immediate start at a good rate; which one do you choose? 2 weeks of doing nothing costs a lot of money, and you don't know what kind of BS people are going to give while the checks are going on, or whether the contract might be pulled by some cost cutting 'senior manager'. While YOU may be trustworthy, some clients and agents aren't, so try and understand the contractor's position.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            No animosity, just suggesting that you remember what contracting's like; you wait for a while for a contract, get 'no' for silly reasons from agents and then three opportunities turn up at once. One of them is a tulipe rate, one of them demands you hang around waiting for 2 weeks (2 weeks! You could make some phone calls to earlier customers in 2 hours and find put if he's any good), one of them is immediate start at a good rate; which one do you choose? 2 weeks of doing nothing costs a lot of money, and you don't know what kind of BS people are going to give while the checks are going on, or whether the contract might be pulled by some cost cutting 'senior manager'. While YOU may be trustworthy, some clients and agents aren't, so try and understand the contractor's position.
            Hence my instructions to HR. 'Make this as quick as possible I don't want to lose him'.
            What happens in General, stays in General.
            You know what they say about assumptions!

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
              Hence my instructions to HR. 'Make this as quick as possible I don't want to lose him'.
              And they did. Which is why it only took 2 weeks.
              merely at clientco for the entertainment

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by eek View Post
                And they did. Which is why it only took 2 weeks.
                Which is why they lost him.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Which is why they lost him.
                  Well yes but based on previous MF stories here that's incredibly fast for this firm.
                  merely at clientco for the entertainment

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                    Seriously? They drug test contractors?
                    I am surprised by your surprise, For anyone working longer than 3 months direct to us part of the T&C is that they will have a test & if they fail the offer is terminated. This applies to all staff not just those on site, so HR, admin ICT etc..

                    D&A tests are normal in construction regardless of employment status, after finding some “suspicions packages” in the drying room on site we called the nurse in & did a full site drugs test. 5 men are no longer working.
                    Growing old is mandatory
                    Growing up is optional

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X