• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Kim's got himself a big bomb

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Usually, yes.
    Don't you just love dictatorships the people are starving and all their leader is concerned with is ballistic missile and nuclear capability there's priorities for you.
    In Scooter we trust

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Troll View Post
      Since:

      Fook all was done when India acquired nuclear weapons
      &
      Fook all was done when Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons

      the answer may be fook all except some posturing
      Don't forget Israel. That strikes me as much more scary than North Korea.

      If NK ever did launch an attack against South Korea, or anyone else, it would guarantee their destruction. There'd be no question of the US et al instituting "regime change", and if there's one thing that dictators like, it's hanging onto power. It's only a problem if we let NK amass so many weapons that they can destroy us before we destroy them.
      Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
        Don't you just love dictatorships the people are starving and all their leader is concerned with is ballistic missile and nuclear capability there's priorities for you.
        It's the only way to do the oppression thing; if the people are well fed they're able to rise up against the dictator as in North Africa and now Syria.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          It's the only way to do the oppression thing; if the people are well fed they're able to rise up against the dictator as in North Africa and now Syria.
          We can only hope it's not too far off then
          In Scooter we trust

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
            Don't you just love dictatorships the people are starving and all their leader is concerned with is ballistic missile and nuclear capability there's priorities for you.
            Winning strategy in Civ5. At least on 'settler' difficulty level.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
              Don't you just love dictatorships the people are starving and all their leader is concerned with is ballistic missile and nuclear capability there's priorities for you.
              Quite


              Revealed: the £130bn hidden cost of Trident replacement | Politics | The Guardian
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Ketchup View Post
                It is actually a small bomb which is more worrying. What the yanks are most worried about is them strapping a nuke to a long range missile, it only requires a small device to wipe out DC or NYC
                That last missile launch (the one that was intended to play 'patriotic songs') was said to be capable of reaching West Coast of US only, so no danger to DC. Not much comfort if you're in California mind.

                North Korean rocket 'can reach US west coast 10,000km away' - Telegraph

                I would have added the DPR view on proceedings, but their website hasn't got any mention of it yet. Some tourist information, if anyone's interested

                Comment


                  #18
                  Money well spent IMHO, as long as the UK isn't just paying the Yanks for the finished product.

                  High-tech projects like that have a trickle down effect, and could benefit the UK in all kinds of ways, such as safer and more efficient nuclear power and more arms sales, and of course maintaining an effective defence.
                  Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                  Comment


                    #19
                    "America, China, Russia, France and the UK have insisted that the nuclear weapons being developed by North Korea are the bad ones that bring fear and uncertainty not the good ones that bring peace and stability."

                    - North Korea’s nuclear weapons aren’t the type that bring peace and stability, insist nuclear states

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Surely a NK bomb lumbering it's way across the sky would be child's play to bring down. Of course the issue of fallout is then raised but stopping it going off should be OK.
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X