Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If you could have a conversation with anyone who is alive or dead
There is a lot of supportive material that a person called Jesus actually existed between 2 BC and 36AD (ish) the argument is what manner of person was he - i.e. just another Prophet, Son of God, or a very very naughty boy ?
HTH
How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think
There is a lot of supportive material that a person called Jesus actually existed between 2 BC and 36AD (ish) the argument is what manner of person was he - i.e. just another Prophet, Son of God, or a very very naughty boy ?
You'd be better off asking St Paul, without him Christianity would more than likely have been just another Jewish sect, just as St Peter wanted it it to be. It was Paul who argued for the relaxation of the Jewish customs that made it unpalatable to the gentiles i.e. circumcision, eating of pork etc. Interestingly one of the earliest surviving works of Christian art in Santa Pudenziana Rome show's the still existent split between the church of the circumcision headed by St Peter and the church of the ex circumcision headed by St Paul. BTW this Friday is the feast day of St Paul's conversion.
But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger
...FYI Jesus is alive or dead according to whether you have faith or not.
No. I don't think his vitality is based on whether you have faith. He either is or he isn't - your beliefs on the matter are irrelevant.
Since Peter was the first pope, is the church of the circumcision the forerunner of the catholic church? (There's little evidence that Peter was part of the circumcision movement in any case - he seems rather to have come under pressure from the movement, and didn't stick up for his principles - hence his rebuke from Paul).
Comment