• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

No really, it was all bulltulip?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    No really, it was all bulltulip?

    EDITORIAL: Chilling climate-change news - Washington Times

    More lies from the IPCC.

    #2
    Oh that - Thought you were talking about that stupid Mayan calendar thing

    Although come to think of it, today isn't over yet
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    Comment


      #3
      The cagw scare mongering would be an idle intellectual curiosity, if it was not for the fact that we are now paying sky high prices for dirt-cheap energy



      (\__/)
      (>'.'<)
      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

      Comment


        #4
        frack off.

        Comment


          #5
          Ah, the Washingon Times - founded, and funded, by the Moonies Unification Church.

          Next week: DP cites L. Ron Hubbard in a debate about the true meaning of Christmas

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
            Ah, the Washingon Times - founded, and funded, by the Moonies Unification Church.

            Next week: DP cites L. Ron Hubbard in a debate about the true meaning of Christmas
            good point

            luckily Forbes has a similar story

            in fact, many main stream news organisations are picking up on the fact that 16 years of no warming just might be a problem for the warming theory



            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment


              #7
              Here is the scientific argument from Professor Judith Curry that climate models are bunk.

              Climate sensitivity in the AR5 SOD | Climate Etc.

              She is writing a paper about why the models are wrong, and it is her expertise, atmospheric science, so lets wait and see.
              Last edited by BlasterBates; 22 December 2012, 11:54.
              I'm alright Jack

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by zeitghost
                I see that the current Xmas Bah! Humbug! issue of New Scientist is still going on about AGW in tedious detail.

                It's a religion, not science.
                I used to think that of Giant Alien Lizards.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by zeitghost
                  I see that the current Xmas Bah! Humbug! issue of New Scientist is still going on about AGW in tedious detail.

                  It's a religion, not science.
                  for anyone who is mildly interested, and who is wondering what this latest bolks is all about-


                  The IPCC said that the planet would warm by x
                  When the planet didnt warm by x, they said it would have, but aerosols kept it cool
                  Now they are saying aerosols have not kept the planet cool


                  but they seem to have forgotten their original prediction, and have not explained the discrepency



                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X