• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Credit search experian - available credit = > £94K !!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post


    NLUK admits he's wrong about something
    Do you think it might make him question if he is wrong on other things??

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by escapeUK View Post
      Euro NCAP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      Comparing test results

      The Euro NCAP frontal impact tests simulates crashing a car into another of similar mass and structure. This means that the ratings can only be meaningfully compared between cars of the same type and size.[6] The following structural categories are used:
      Passenger car
      MPV
      Off-roader
      Roadster
      Pickup
      In each category, cars which are within 150 kg of one another are considered comparable

      Buying your car | Euro NCAP - For safer cars crash test safety rating

      Are large cars safer than small cars?
      In frontal impacts between cars, the occupants of the heavier car or the one with higher structures tend to fare better than those travelling in lighter, lower cars. As it is not possible to simulate the influence of mass in a test against a fixed barrier, Euro NCAP recommends comparison only between cars which are of a similar mass (+/- 150kg) and in the same category. Such comparisons allow the relative safety performance of cars to be judged accurately.

      Can results be compared between groups?
      Accurate comparisons can only be made between cars in the same group. The frontal test mirrors a crash between two cars of similar size. A heavier car or one with a higher structure will tend to have an advantage if it impacts a smaller car. The Euro NCAP results cannot be used to predict the outcome of such crashes.

      Aygo Weight = 890
      Ford Focus = 1270
      VW Golf = 1323

      And so on.

      But Ive already said what the experience of my father was, in a crash little car = dead or disabled, big car = walk away with stiff neck.
      Thats it Im going to fill my Sedona up bags of sand. 5 seats replaced and piled high with bags of sand will weigh tons!!!

      Might only do 3 mpg then!
      Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

      Comment


        #33
        So, in conclusion - driving M1A2 Abrams MBT is much safer in the unlikely event of front collision with an Aygo?

        Well, I never...

        Comment


          #34
          Re: Credit search experian - available credit = > £94K !!

          It's amazing what you learn about car crash testing whilst reading a thread about having too many credit cards.

          I spent ages looking for information about how good cars are in a roll, but NCAP don't test for that. The US equivalent have a rating for roll, but that's roll resistance, rather than how well the occupants are protected. It seems the industry and the public are happy to accept that you're probably dead if your car ends up upside down, as indeed happened to some poor unfortunates on the M6 last week.

          This is after seeing a couple of people crawl out of an upside down S2000. Ironically, it seems you're better off in a convertible than most cars.
          Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
            It's amazing what you learn about car crash testing whilst reading a thread about having too many credit cards.

            I spent ages looking for information about how good cars are in a roll, but NCAP don't test for that. The US equivalent have a rating for roll, but that's roll resistance, rather than how well the occupants are protected. It seems the industry and the public are happy to accept that you're probably dead if your car ends up upside down, as indeed happened to some poor unfortunates on the M6 last week.

            This is after seeing a couple of people crawl out of an upside down S2000. Ironically, it seems you're better off in a convertible than most cars.
            My Z350 has two huge roll bars behind the driver and passenger seats plus re-enforced windscreen pillars. I have to say I would feel safer in that being upside down than a normal family car from a crush perspective but looking at the dints down the middle of a roof in rolls you have to wonder what that would have done to me coming through a lightly framed canvass hood. Bars don't protect from other objects caving in parts of the roof.
            'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

            Comment


              #36
              If you want to talk about cars crashing into each other, start your own boring thread.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                If you want to talk about cars crashing into each other, start your own boring thread.
                instead of using this boring thread?
                'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
                  Just got a freebie experian credit search and results were that even though my credit score was good, available credit was a bit excessive.

                  Anyway, looking at it, I've got 9 credit cards with available credit of over £94K. Scary. Luckily, outstanding is very low indeed - just a few balance transfer at 1.9% or something. About 5 of these cards I aint used in years they're just sitting there with zero balance.

                  Had problems getting a loan a few years - looks like this is why. I guess theoretically, I could get a loan then hike cards up to their limit and be screwed. Scary though as to what the minimum payment on £94K would be. (2.5% of £94K = £2350 a month, interest at 1.6%/month approx = £1500 WOW!). Approaching a permie salary for the month there!

                  I think I better close a few. Only trouble is even though I can login to most online I cant even find the cards so I dont know the card no.

                  Its gotta be done but its reassuring to have it available. Its like I'll have the card there just in case I need it.....
                  The banks do two credit checks, one external and one internal. The internal one has much more stringent criteria. You will find the actual credit will be very much less.
                  "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Just been to see the nice people at Barclays today about opening a premier account. Currently with santander who are complete pants.

                    Seems like a better option because you have a personal banking manager to talk to about loans etc. Seemed to understand the score etc.
                    Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X