Why should my MP worry about retrospective taxation on avoiders?

[d000hg]

Yes most people think its immoral, so a law is proposed & passed after due consideration, it is modified and improved in production

Most people think its immoral for someone to earn more than them, maybe we need a law? no they don't
Many people think its immoral to commit infidelity, maybe we need a law? Sure. In fact I'm a bit surprised it isn't
Many people think its immoral that some people get benefits , maybe we need a law?That's an infantile example. Many != most... the vast majority are in favour of the welfare state in some form.

Some parties think its immoral that businesses pay tax differently to them because the papers say so, maybe we need a law?

Most people think the existing legal system is a mess and there is too much regulation & loopholes , maybe we need a law?

[vetran]

Most people think its immoral for someone to earn more than them, maybe we need a law? no they don't
Many people think its immoral to commit infidelity, maybe we need a law? Sure. In fact I'm a bit surprised it isn't
Many people think its immoral that some people get benefits , maybe we need a law?That's an infantile example. Many != most... the vast majority are in favour of the welfare state in some form.

see you disagree with me,
Communism is quite popular.
Infidelity is a social issue not a legal one.
Many!=most have you read the papers or looked at voting figures.

only way to create or amend a law is to use reason not emotion

[minestrone]

Doog, do us a favour and get shot of the animated nazi smilie sig.

Some of us work for places where that will get folk into trouble.

[Robinho]

Doog, do us a favour and get shot of the animated nazi smilie sig.

Some of us work for places where that will get folk into trouble.

The guy wants to outlaw infidelity.

He possibly has Nazi tendencies.

[minestrone]

He can demand compulsory female circumscription for all I care. The guy has zoomerish tendacies but he should put that down in text.

Having 40 Hitlers with swastika flags waving will be a problem for casual viewers of the site and I can say it is that for me.

[centurian]

Having 38 Hitlers with swastika flags waving will be a problem for casual viewers of the site and I can say it is that for me.

FTFY

[d000hg]

Doog, do us a favour and get shot of the animated nazi smilie sig.

Some of us work for places where that will get folk into trouble.

Awww. You can hide sigs (I've heard) and you could block that single image.

But I only did it 'cos it looked cute, I'm amazed nobody has complained about it before - admin has censored me before for using overly colorful text!

[d000hg]

only way to create or amend a law is to use reason not emotion

I don't believe you can reason your way to morality.

[minestrone]

Awww. You can hide sigs (I've heard) and you could block that single image.

But I only did it 'cos it looked cute, I'm amazed nobody has complained about it before - admin has censored me before for using overly colorful text!

You work from home, some of us have to work for places where multiple little tiny animated Hitlers waving nazi flags looks decidedly dodgy and will impact.

A sense of perspective and context need be applied.

I cannot force you to make the right decision, I only ask and question your decision to place that as your sig.

[minestrone]

Cheers!