Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You''ll live where we put you
Collapse
X
-
-
Living in your quiet cul - de sac in Cheam I guess you get to it allOriginally posted by Gentile View PostThere are legal remedies to deal with people who behave in the ways you've described. This article isn't about such people. It's about people who can't afford rent. Whilst there may be some overlap, you do need to differentiate between the two when you're discussing fair housing policies.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Here you go:Originally posted by Scoobos View PostThe whole topic isn't as black and white as benefit cheats and the genuinelly unable, be it through lack of opportunity or disability.
"Them" seems to imply that you think all people in council houses are somehow frauds, it's a bit insulting and very far from the mark.
Council house boot for tenants earning more than £60,000 | The Sun |News|PoliticsLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI always suspected that this was a significant number but that is shocking.Up to 40,000 homes could be freed up, saving £122million a year.Comment
-
I don't think their motives are relevant. It is rightly seen as unjust when people are asked to subsidise others for things, like living in pricey areas or having more kids, that they cannot afford for themselves and that is very destructive of incentive."Them" seems to imply that you think all people in council houses are somehow frauds, it's a bit insulting and very far from the mark.
Personally, I think we need to restore a great deal more Darwin into our society. At the moment, the least able are being funded to breed at a higher rate than the more able who fund them. If we carry on like that, we in the West will disappear back into the primordial soup. Child allowances and benefits need to be cut. If you depend on the state you should do whatever is reasonably required to remove the burden on others.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Surely it's the goal of civilisation to turn the entire world into an area where there are no poor people?Originally posted by mudskipper View PostIs it healthy to have entire areas (the whole of the south east?) where there are no poor people?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
I disagree with that. There are a few categories of doleite/housing recipient in my opinion.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostI don't think their motives are relevant. It is rightly seen as unjust when people are asked to subsidise others for things, like living in pricey areas or having more kids, that they cannot afford for themselves and that is very destructive of incentive.
The one who are there due to circs or misfortune and who are fighting like heck to get back to work etc.
The ones who are there temporalily while they get educated, etc, with the aim of getting into work
The ones who have perfect motives, but will never be a tap dancer because they only have one leg
The ones who are playing the system and milking it
The first three we all love, and give them every assistance. It's the last bunch who we all hate and want to feed to the pigs. fckng drones (and believe me, poor people who stuggle, hate them more than we do)
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
agree so when it becomes obvious when people fall into the last slot and are getting more than £400 / week then lets move them to Gravesend.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostI disagree with that. There are a few categories of doleite/housing recipient in my opinion.
The one who are there due to circs or misfortune and who are fighting like heck to get back to work etc.
The ones who are there temporalily while they get educated, etc, with the aim of getting into work
The ones who have perfect motives, but will never be a tap dancer because they only have one leg
The ones who are playing the system and milking it
The first three we all love, and give them every assistance. It's the last bunch who we all hate and want to feed to the pigs. fckng drones (and believe me, poor people who stuggle, hate them more than we do)

Comment
-
Will a living wage provide them with the incentive to get off their backsides? possibly not the thing that gets me is that a certain section of society believe that certain types of jobs are beneath them.In Scooter we trust
Comment
-
my comment was actually about low wage employees that have their accommodation and living expenses subsidised via benefits when the large employers pay no tax in the UK, so in effect the country is subsidising Starbucks and saving their employees from starving.Originally posted by The Spartan View PostWill a living wage provide them with the incentive to get off their backsides? possibly not the thing that gets me is that a certain section of society believe that certain types of jobs are beneath them.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment