• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Jimmy Savile 'household name' sweep

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    You're smoking crack if you think this will.
    I agree. Perhaps the question is how to change footballer attitudes.

    I would like to bring back the maximum wage.

    Comment


      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      The thread is about anyone in the public eye who grooms, sexually assaults or rapes a child, or any non-consenting adult dead or alive.
      I thought it was about the inquiries into historical pedophiles, YewTree, etc?

      So if he went for at 13 year old like the guys in Rotherham you would have thought that was OK as well? There has to be a line drawn somewhere and this line is 16.
      And the further away from the line you get, the worse it gets... and to an extent how far you are from the line. 17-15 would be hardly anything. 17-12 would be bad. 13 is worse than 15.

      And I didn't say it was OK. I just said it wasn't a case of paedophilia hence didn't seem to fit this thread.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        I thought it was about the inquiries into historical pedophiles, YewTree, etc?

        And the further away from the line you get, the worse it gets... and to an extent how far you are from the line. 17-15 would be hardly anything. 17-12 would be bad. 13 is worse than 15.

        And I didn't say it was OK. I just said it wasn't a case of paedophilia hence didn't seem to fit this thread.
        Technically, paedophilia is sexual attraction by an adult to a prepubescent child. If the child is older, it's hebephilia (11-14) or ephebephilia (15-19). So no, he's not a paedophile.

        Comment


          Adam Johnson's family paid £170,000 to alleged fraudster who promised to clear disgraced footballer's name - Telegraph

          Comment


            Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
            Technically, paedophilia is sexual attraction by an adult to a prepubescent child. If the child is older, it's hebephilia (11-14) or ephebephilia (15-19). So no, he's not a paedophile.
            Those are some great new words. Ironic that hebe is a kind of large bush and hebephiles presumably do not like ...
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              Rolf Harris pleads not guilty to eight charges | UK news | The Guardian

              If that is trial by jury he stands no chance.....

              Comment


                Cliff 👍👎?
                Guy Fawkes - "The last man to enter Parliament with honourable intentions."

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Alf W View Post
                  Cliff 👍👎?
                  It's a big dossier!
                  How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    Feck me. Clement Freud.
                    With a corresponding apology from Mrs Freud, if I heard the radio correctly.

                    Comment


                      Buzz.




                      Deviation.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X