• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Good time to bug your MP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
    Any losses would be privatised to the individual, so it's not really much of an issue for society as a whole. For the majority of people the cost of alcohol is not the limiting factor in their consumption, so it's only unproductive poor people that would be left to die.
    If people are too unwell to work, then that are not being productive and are not contributing to the national economy.

    So, let's make it simple for you:

    What will the impact be on the national economy of scrapping alcohol and tobacco duties?
    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

    George Frederic Watts

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

    Comment


      Originally posted by Robinho View Post
      ...it's only unproductive poor people that would be left to die.
      What a wonderful vision of society.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        What a wonderful vision of society.
        I'm not even going there. Let's sort out the economics first.
        The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

        George Frederic Watts

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

        Comment


          ...

          Originally posted by speling bee View Post
          I'm not even going there. Let's sort out the economics first.
          Now you know that is not going to happen....


          ....so far this business case has not got one number in to justify it. We are only on page 29 ffs.

          Comment


            Originally posted by speling bee View Post
            If people are too unwell to work, then that are not being productive and are not contributing to the national economy.

            So, let's make it simple for you:

            What will the impact be on the national economy of scrapping alcohol and tobacco duties?
            They would also be consuming less too. So the resources that would have gone to them could go elsewhere.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Robinho View Post
              They would also be consuming less too. So the resources that would have gone to them could go elsewhere.
              That does not answer the question. So again:

              What will the impact be on the national economy of scrapping alcohol and tobacco duties?
              The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

              George Frederic Watts

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

              Comment


                Let's say you eliminated the least productive people in society. How would the GDP per capita look?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by speling bee View Post
                  That does not answer the question. So again:

                  What will the impact be on the national economy of scrapping alcohol and tobacco duties?
                  I have a question too. Who will determine the value of my land and how?
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Robinho View Post
                    Let's say you eliminated the least productive people in society.

                    Are you proposing genocide?
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      Survival of the fittest would be more accurate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X