Originally posted by Robinho
View Post
Q.E.D.
Your argument consisted of an assertion that "if you run the equations it's true", followed by a rapid climbdown when asked to back the statement up, where you stated that it wasn't possible to run the equations because there were none. I'd say that was countered.
Originally posted by Robinho
Originally posted by Robinho
Originally posted by Robhinho
One doesn't need to counter your arguments because you do it so effectively yourself.


Comment