Originally posted by Doggy Styles
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Red Bull doesn't give you brains!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
If I'm remembering my trivia correctly, 10% of the engine power on Concorde was to run the air conditioning, as the skin gets so hot at that speed it would cook the passengers. Plus the metal expands meaning Concorde was 2 metres longer at Mach 2 than on the ground. Famously the Blackbird leaks fuel when on the ground for the same reason.Will work inside IR35. Or for food. -
Concorde's skin expanded, opening up gaps between the internal bulkheads and consoles on the flight-deck, leaving a nice gap for the flight mechanic to pop his hat into after take-off. If he forgot to remove it as they slowed down the hat would be squashed flat and become trapped until the next flight.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIf I'm remembering my trivia correctly, 10% of the engine power on Concorde was to run the air conditioning, as the skin gets so hot at that speed it would cook the passengers. Plus the metal expands meaning Concorde was 2 metres longer at Mach 2 than on the ground. Famously the Blackbird leaks fuel when on the ground for the same reason.
I understand that each and every BA Concorde now sports a flight engineers hat stuck firmly in place forever.Comment
-
-
I'm trying to watch it via the Redbull Stratos site but for reasons only known to them they have made the process as convoluted as possible, why not just stream it on the homepage??
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Comment
-
Done any HALO?Originally posted by Gentile View PostInteresting stuff. I'm going to watch that.
The real risk with a HALO jump isn't in failing to slow down enough (he'll have a drogue chute for that), or in missing his mark for opening the chute (he'll have a hitefinder that opens his main chute automatically for that, and most likely he'll be opening at a safe altitude anyway). Ironically, his biggest risk is probably going to be a safety device: his reserve chute. If you accidentally deploy your reserve chute too early on that type of jump, you're screwed one way or another. Because you need oxygen to make it through the highest altitude part of the descent (which lasts just over two minutes or so at 35,000 ft, and probably about five minutes freefall for this guy at the altitude he's jumping from, depending on when he opens his chute).
You need to breathe pure oxygen to avoid getting the equivalent of the bends as you ascend to that sort of altitude. And you need to stay on that pure oxygen until you're at a safe altitude again during the descent. To do that you've got a "bailout bottle" (a little bigger than soda stream bottle), which contains about fifteen minutes' worth of oxygen. If your reserve chute accidentally deploys too early, you're faced with either running out of oxygen before you reach a safe altitude, or trying to use a hook knife to cut the reserve cords manually so you can continue freefalling. (Reserve chutes, unlike the main, are physically attached to the harness). It'd be unlikely you'd be able to cut away a canopy like that without falling into a spin and getting entangled in it.
He certainly deserves some respect for the attempt. I just hope he stays away from that reserve toggle!
Thought not.
Comment
-
I thought I'd read that icing up was a big issue early on, then heating up later.
Delayed for an hour at least.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Comment
-
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
I just hope he gets back to terra firma in a survivable state.
Btw, what are those moving dots? Insects?Last edited by SupremeSpod; 9 October 2012, 12:50.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36


Comment