Is Sas cleverer than you?

[DimPrawn]

Most posters on CUK are dimmer than average. Sas probably has a healthy IQ of about 115. Most CUK posters are therefore probably dimmer than Sas, if we are happy to run with IQ as a measure of cleverness. However, many of these poster are dim enough that they probably lack the ability to tell that they are dimmer than Sas, so the results of the poll will be interesting.

I'm really dim.

No I am honest.

[BrilloPad]

Sas probably has a healthy IQ of about 115.

I doubt it is that high. But more importantly he has severe mental health issues. In particular he has a form of tourettes which forces him to reply "cretin" to alot of posts.

I reckon he is at Forrest Gump level.

[speling bee]

I doubt it is that high. But more importantly he has severe mental health issues. In particular he has a form of tourettes which forces him to reply "cretin" to alot of posts.

I reckon he is at Forrest Gump level.

No, he can put together a decent argument.

[mudskipper]

Most posters on CUK are dimmer than average. Sas probably has a healthy IQ of about 115. Most CUK posters are therefore probably dimmer than Sas, if we are happy to run with IQ as a measure of cleverness. However, many of these poster are dim enough that they probably lack the ability to tell that they are dimmer than Sas, so the results of the poll will be interesting.

There was an interesting article (I think it was one of Nick's Monday Links ages ago) that showed how mediocre people way over estimate their abilities, and brighter ones underestimate. So the sasguru paradox may indeed be true.

Edit: similar link added
http://www.isciencemag.co.uk/blog/in...t-not-know-it/

[eek]

Most posters on CUK are dimmer than average. Sas probably has a healthy IQ of about 115. Most CUK posters are therefore probably dimmer than Sas, if we are happy to run with IQ as a measure of cleverness. However, many of these poster are dim enough that they probably lack the ability to tell that they are dimmer than Sas, so the results of the poll will be interesting.

As I know my IQ I also know that it ain't worth the paper its written on.

I also know that its not worth trying to be clever as while I may be three steps ahead of the game trying to think of the words small enough for management to understand takes ages.

[EternalOptimist]

I am smart enough to know that it doesn't matter how smart I am
I am smart enough to be able to get the one or two things in life that I really want
I am smart enough not to regret the things that I dont really want and I am not smart enough to get


EternalAristotle

[d000hg]

Most posters on CUK are dimmer than average.

You've got a really over-optimistic view of average then, however poor your opinion of the CUK member-base. If you work in a professional trade, the average people you know are way above average.

[bobspud]

Why would you choose a slow provider unless you were thick?

Because the slower provider might have a less contended bandwidth in your area giving you a better service than a rammed service with only a theoretical max speed...

[original PM]

Because the slower provider might have a less contended bandwidth in your area giving you a better service than a rammed service with only a theoretical max speed...

a good point - but I think the question was a bit rhetorical really

[speling bee]

You've got a really over-optimistic view of average then, however poor your opinion of the CUK member-base. If you work in a professional trade, the average people you know are way above average.

I tend to work with pretty bright people, but I was talking about the dross that hangs about on this site.