• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Bible reviews

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    According to the Bible, all of mankind descended
    from one man and one woman who had two sons. Think about that.
    Take all the time you need.

    (Apparently...)
    Did they adopt, like Elton John?
    nomadd liked this post

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      How else would you have answered the question "Where do we come from?" two to three thousand years ago?

      or "What are these shells in this rock? We're "miles" away from the sea?"

      or "What happens when we die?"

      or "How do we keep the general population in line and maintain the status quo? We need something to put the fear of God in to people...


      hows about

      'I dunno'



      (\__/)
      (>'.'<)
      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

      Comment


        #13
        Genesis 19:34

        The next day, the firstborn said to the younger, “Behold, I lay last night with my father. Let us make him drink wine tonight also. Then you go in and lie with him, that we may preserve offspring from our father.”
        Filth!
        "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

        Comment


          #14
          Oral sex between consenting males is mentioned eleven times in the Bible
          and never censoriously, yet any mention of it has been edited out of the
          Readers Digest condensed version.
          Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

          Comment


            #15
            Don't think that was covered in "365 Bible stories for children", which is my reference point.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
              Oral sex between consenting males is mentioned eleven times in the Bible
              and never censoriously, yet any mention of it has been edited out of the
              Readers Digest condensed version.
              There is nothing wrong in just talking about sex...
              "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                There is nothing wrong in just talking about sex...

                ...depends what's in your mouth at the time.
                nomadd liked this post

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by nomadd View Post
                  ...
                  In which case I suggest you research the history of mathematics. Some truly staggering works, both creatively and intellectually, penned many, many centuries before the Bible and all other leading modern religious texts....
                  Such as? Euclid was 300BCE, Pythagorous ~600BCE. The consensus among scholars about, for example, the book of Ezekiel (another x-rated portion of the Bible), is mostly the writings of one man who lived in Babylonia during the exile of Judah, about ~500BCE. The first chapter of Genesis is from about the same time - that's when most of the deuteronomical history was put together as well. The earliest portions - mostly in the first 15 chapters of Genesis - come from before 2000BCE - though again, the compilation and editing was during the exile. I struggle with the idea that texts originating between ~4000 and 1800 years old can be described as "modern".

                  I'd be surprised if Rowling is still well known in 20 years.
                  Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Gentile View Post
                    There used to be a great satirical website called The Brick Testament a few years ago, depicting scenes from the Bible in Lego. It's still online, but it's now basically just an advert for the same material that's been converted to e-book format.
                    Brick Testament is/was wonderful, and I don't recall it being satire. I've see it used in quite a few sermons
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                      Such as? Euclid was 300BCE, Pythagoras ~600BCE.
                      The Greeks? Late arrivals on the scene (and as is famously known, the Pythagorean theorem was both known and utilised by Indian and Egyptian mathematicians centuries before the birth of Pythagoras.) Summerian and Egyptian mathematicians pre-date the Greek mathematicians by over 1500 years.

                      But, of course, the point I was making was that they were doing something intellectual challenging - not simply making up stories to entertain/control the masses.

                      Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                      The consensus among scholars about, for example, the book of Ezekiel (another x-rated portion of the Bible), is mostly the writings of one man who lived in Babylonia during the exile of Judah, about ~500BCE. The first chapter of Genesis is from about the same time - that's when most of the deuteronomical history was put together as well. The earliest portions - mostly in the first 15 chapters of Genesis - come from before 2000BCE - though again, the compilation and editing was during the exile. I struggle with the idea that texts originating between ~4000 and 1800 years old can be described as "modern".
                      Well, as I stated, if it's simple story telling, then look at the work of Homer (8th century BCE) and its sources - an oral tradition of story telling that stretches back many, many thousands of years. That oral tradition goes back many tens of thousands of years, certainly well into pre-history. Pictorial representations of hunting stories and the traditions surrounding them have been dated to 40,000 years ago. So, as I said, the current crop of religions are based on relatively modern stories and lead characters (so-called "prophets".)

                      Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                      I'd be surprised if Rowling is still well known in 20 years.
                      Like I said, who knows? I don't follow her work myself, but I honestly think she will still be pretty well known in 20 years. Don't underestimate the power of marketing and greed - these have a habit of keeping stories going far longer than their shelf-life; visit a local church and its resident preacher for a fine example of this.
                      nomadd liked this post

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X