Hmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How is this proportional and fair?
Collapse
X
-
-
The RBL is a non-denominational organisation open to all so has nothing to do with religion, so cannot be racial. Where does it say the poppies were not his property?Originally posted by Scoobos View PostI think that burning poppies in front of mourners , with its context in the wars in the Islamic world, is both racial hatred and criminal damage. The poppies were not his property, isn't this the same???
The law may be an ass but its all we gotOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Anyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?





Should someone inform customs and immigration? 'Nothing wrong with muslims, chaps, it's just the ones who point their finger into the sky; they can be a bit awkward'.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 30 August 2012, 15:05.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Both cases merited a £10 fine, followed by apologies to the 'victims'
The poppy burner would have been flown out to Afghan, where could apologise to a few squaddies then left in a minefield
The ex Squaddie could have apologised to the pigs head
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
I think Tone would be getting the maximum sentence under the tuliphead legislation; life.Originally posted by speling bee View PostSo you want less freedom of expression?
I think 50 quid is quite harsh, bearing in mind that all Tony Blair got for the crime of starting an aggressive war was a job as Middle East Peace EnvoyAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Because Poppies are a symbol for those who died irrespective if they are black, while, brown, yellow or green.Originally posted by Scoobos View PostHmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Where does it say criminal damage? The page saysOriginally posted by Scoobos View PostHmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.
Choudhury, of Hunton Street, was found guilty under Section 5 of the Public Order Act of burning the poppies in a way that was likely to cause "harassment, harm or distress" to those who witnessed it.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
FTFYOriginally posted by EternalOptimist View PostBoth cases merited a £10 fine, followed by apologies to the 'victims'
The poppy burner would have been flown out to Afghan, where could apologise to a few squaddies then left in a minefield
The ex Squaddie could have apologised to the pigs head in Mecca
The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
precaution. just in case the safety catch is off and they have an NDOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAnyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Finger in the air, face covered, wild look in his eyes. Got extremist written all over it this one...Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAnyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?
Should someone inform customs and immigration? 'Nothing wrong with muslims, chaps, it's just the ones who point their finger into the sky; they can ba a bit awkward'.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment