Hmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How is this proportional and fair?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostI think that burning poppies in front of mourners , with its context in the wars in the Islamic world, is both racial hatred and criminal damage. The poppies were not his property, isn't this the same???
The law may be an ass but its all we gotOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Anyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?
Should someone inform customs and immigration? 'Nothing wrong with muslims, chaps, it's just the ones who point their finger into the sky; they can be a bit awkward'.Last edited by Mich the Tester; 30 August 2012, 15:05.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Both cases merited a £10 fine, followed by apologies to the 'victims'
The poppy burner would have been flown out to Afghan, where could apologise to a few squaddies then left in a minefield
The ex Squaddie could have apologised to the pigs head
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostSo you want less freedom of expression?
I think 50 quid is quite harsh, bearing in mind that all Tony Blair got for the crime of starting an aggressive war was a job as Middle East Peace EnvoyAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostHmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Originally posted by Scoobos View PostHmm, I agree with the sentiment NLUK but I don't see how burning poppies isn't criminal damage and inciting racial hatred either. But now I'm repeating myself like a true raving maniac.
Choudhury, of Hunton Street, was found guilty under Section 5 of the Public Order Act of burning the poppies in a way that was likely to cause "harassment, harm or distress" to those who witnessed it.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostBoth cases merited a £10 fine, followed by apologies to the 'victims'
The poppy burner would have been flown out to Afghan, where could apologise to a few squaddies then left in a minefield
The ex Squaddie could have apologised to the pigs head in Mecca
The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAnyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAnyway, why do extremist muslims always seem to have one finger pointing in the air?
Should someone inform customs and immigration? 'Nothing wrong with muslims, chaps, it's just the ones who point their finger into the sky; they can ba a bit awkward'.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment