• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

We totally aced the Olympics

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by louie View Post
    TeamGB are actually 4th after Russia if you look at total medals, which is a more sensible way to order the table? Say for example country A won 60 silvers 30 bronze and 0 golds, but country B won 1 gold 0 other medals, would country A be more succesfull than country B?
    No because gold is worth more than bronze and silver. No **** off and come back when you're cleverer.
    What happens in General, stays in General.
    You know what they say about assumptions!

    Comment


      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      Coming from you, that is absolutely hilarious!

      Old Greg, I'll rephrase my original comment, just so that there's no misunderstanding.

      "In my personal experience of working with and for members of the Jewish community both in Manchester and Jerusalem I have found them to be insular and self-serving. I was left in no doubt of my position that as a gentile I was deemed inferior."

      Infer from that what you like.
      Ah! So you wouldn't draw any general conclusions about Jews?

      Comment


        Originally posted by louie View Post
        TeamGB are actually 4th after Russia if you look at total medals, which is a more sensible way to order the table? Say for example country A won 60 silvers 30 bronze and 0 golds, but country B won 1 gold 0 other medals, would country A be more succesfull than country B?
        Depends if you're happy never being the best at anything.

        Comment


          Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
          No because gold is worth more than bronze and silver. No **** off and come back when you're cleverer.
          I agree with you that Gold is worth more, but is 1 Gold worth 100 silvers? I guess it depends on your perspective. I find the abuse on these forums pretty ridiculous.

          Comment


            Originally posted by louie View Post
            I agree with you that Gold is worth more, but is 1 Gold worth 100 silvers? I guess it depends on your perspective. I find the abuse on these forums pretty ridiculous.
            Let's say gold 3points, silver 2 , bronze 1.
            What happens in General, stays in General.
            You know what they say about assumptions!

            Comment


              Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
              Let's say gold 3points, silver 2 , bronze 1.
              Ah is that how the table is worked out? Sorry then I thought it was ordered by golds won then silvers won then bronzes won.

              Comment


                Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                Let's say gold 3points, silver 2 , bronze 1.
                With 1 bonus point for each competitor who tried very hard, showed real sportsmanship or had a lovely time.

                Comment


                  Gold is being the best at something.

                  Silver and bronze are consolation prizes.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by louie View Post
                    Ah is that how the table is worked out? Sorry then I thought it was ordered by golds won then silvers won then bronzes won.
                    Let's order it by the value of the metal then.
                    What happens in General, stays in General.
                    You know what they say about assumptions!

                    Comment


                      GB were 4th IIRC in China last time which is about as far from home advantage as a western nation can get, so moving up one place due to home advantage is reasonable but even 4th is remarkable.

                      And I think most of the difference is not simply crowd support, but extra funding for this Games to ensure we did well.

                      Any way you slice it, for a country with 60m people to come 3rd (or even top 5) is objectively a great achievement.

                      What makes S.Korea so good?
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X