Originally posted by pjclarke
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Jimmy Carr: 'I've made a terrible error of judgement'
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
It's not often that you see the words cost-effective being linked to the NHS unless there is a not in there somewhere!Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.
I preferred version 1! -
You are correct, I was before I was transferred to private care but nature of the hospital makes no difference, had it been a private hospital (the nearest one to me did not have the facilities and the next was too far away).Originally posted by doodab View PostSome of them probably would, just as others would rather commit crime and others would rather freeload by not paying their taxes. They are all undesirables and all that we can do is manage them as best we can.
As an aside, when you injured your hand on that saw, were you not taken to an NHS hospital who presumably are at least partially responsible for saving your hand? And if so, would you trade your hand for a a £24k a year tax refund?
Don't get me wrong, I think the NHS is a fantastic service and I support it wholeheartedly and would quite happily see my contributions to it increased, but only at the cost of reducing inflated pensions for those that don't deserve it or benefits to scroungers who waste My money on drink and drugs.Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Quite a lot of studies comparing different healthcare systems in different countries show that contrary to the popular belief that the private sector would be more effective or provide much better bang for the buck the reverse is generally true. I think the reason the NHS is singled out for so much criticism is because it's a single monolithic organisation and hence has a huge budget. The fact is that we are at the low end of healthcare spending in the west and spend a lot less per patient than in the US, and yet we have some of the best outcomes and highest patient satisfaction.Originally posted by BoredBloke View PostIt's not often that you see the words cost-effective being linked to the NHS unless there is a not in there somewhere!While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
It's fine as long as you smoke them yourself - this will kill you quicker and Govt will be better off by using your pension money to sustain ponzi scheme for a wee bit longer...Originally posted by SimonMac View PostIf you go to Spain and buy 1000 cigarettes and pay less than you would in the UK, is that illegal? Or immoral?Comment
-
According to an 'expert' on R4 the US system wastes $3trillion annually, thats the deficit between the insurance premiums people pay and what actualy gets spent on providing healthcare.Originally posted by doodab View PostQuite a lot of studies comparing different healthcare systems in different countries show that contrary to the popular belief that the private sector would be more effective or provide much better bang for the buck the reverse is generally true. I think the reason the NHS is singled out for so much criticism is because it's a single monolithic organisation and hence has a huge budget. The fact is that we are at the low end of healthcare spending in the west and spend a lot less per patient than in the US, and yet we have some of the best outcomes and highest patient satisfaction.
Gives people jobs I suppose.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Comment
-
Personally I don't know why he's said "sorry".Originally posted by AtW View PostSo in conclusion he said "I am sorry" and won't pay taxes he avoided all this time?
He hasn't broken any laws and his tax affairs should be between himself, his accountant and HMRC.
Comment
-
Still, it's the thought that counts.Originally posted by AtW View PostSo in conclusion he said "I am sorry" and won't pay taxes he avoided all this time?
Comment
-
Why did he say that he made an judgement error then?Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostHe hasn't broken any laws and his tax affairs should be between himself, his accountant and HMRC.
Comment
-
Probably because he feared he might not get as much TV work or other gigs.Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostPersonally I don't know why he's said "sorry".
He hasn't broken any laws and his tax affairs should be between himself, his accountant and HMRC.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment